Lol

I’m hoping the defense contractors who are losing billions in cancelled contracts will take care of the problem. Or maybe the cartels.

Most of that still won’t do anything because they don’t have the numbers (like articles of impeachment). The house needs 4 Republicans to go against the pack to hit 50%.

I’m not saying it’s not worth doing, but FlexibleToast was saying that all of that is posturing and won’t accomplish anything.

The answer is that Democrats can’t directly do anything, which was what the person you responded to was alluding to.

He’s not ineffectual at being a cult leader with a rabid following, and he controls the DoJ

They’re not scared of Trump personally doing anything to them.

It’s possible for it to make it through the house, but the Senate definitely won’t remove him.

Literally anything can be addictive. Humans love pressing the dopamine button. The features that Lemmy has which are shared with other social media platforms can definitely increase the addictive potential.

I would piss on his grave, though

It’s basically like a tiny virtual machine running locally.

Alright, I’m done indulging your stupidity.

We can play what-if all day long, but that doesn’t make it true.

There’s that pesky reading comprehension again.

No one but the TLC was supporting corporate ownership of residential property.

What the actual fuck are you talking about?

My doorbell camera has an SD card in it.

And it’s pretty trivial to hack a consumer wifi device. The government absolutely has that ability.

It’s ridiculous that a camera won’t record video without an Internet connection.

Correct. I’m telling you that individuals owning a single home aren’t part of the problem.

The billionaire fortunes pale in comparison to the trillions of dollars of unearned appreciation owned by regular home owners.

Yes they did.

What do regular home owners have to do with it? Most regular home owners only own one home.

One big problem is the parents could very well be the ones who gave them the STD.

That is actually well within the realm of possibility.

No. The electoral college was created because the founders didn’t trust the uneducated general population to not elect a tyrant, so the EC was supposed to be made up of educated people who wouldn’t be stupid enough to vote against the best interests of the people.

It also had a bit to do with how long it took to count votes at the time.

Are you sure you’re not thinking about the 3/5 compromise?