I Should’ve read the article, it doesn’t belong here
I Should’ve read the article, it doesn’t belong here
How do you think they’re detecting what to sensor, how are they censoring it?
To the execution lock
Tili go tili go
To the murderous airlock
Tili go
Mi go proudly to mi death
And mi try wit mi dying breath
To warn of the rocks to fall
Tili go
First you commented from McDonaldIsHealthy@lemmus.org and then deleted it. And commented same thing from another account
I don’t think it’s prefer one over the other. For India world is not binary. There is a reason it’s called third world country, Russian partnership doesn’t meant distance from West and western partnership doesn’t mean distance from Russia. India doesn’t have the luxury to pick sides. It has to keep engaging all global partners.
India is not distancing itself from West, but geopolitics are different for India. West has not been a reliable trading partner in last 8 decades, last decade West has been reliable but that’s mostly because now they want to counter China. USSR/Russia has been more reliable.
But if you take a subset of defense trading partner, West has been very unreliable period. If you look at all the corruption scandals in Indian Defense history you’d realise almost all are with the west, France, Sweden, Italy.
Now going back to broader business and economic development, your argument is probably valid, but from the point of view of India, it is in position of most relative strength in geopolitics than it has ever been, if India can play both sides, it will and it must.
If any dealings with Russia were followed by sanction from the west, I think that’s when you’d see who does India favor more. But west won’t do it, because West needs India to be strong to counter China and if the cost is delayed fall of Putin, I think west is willing to take that risk, since Russia is no longer the threat it was to the west 3 decades ago.
So, from Indian’s point of view if it can both have a cake and eat it too, why would it not?
You’re right, i meant to say, anything larger than a single island nation. Will edit original comment.
You’re right oil and gas companies have more funding for CCS but it’s not like agri has 0 funding, they have also gotten single digit billions so far. UCS https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/agricultural-practices-and-carbon-sequestration-fact-sheet
World economic forum https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/how-carbon-smart-farming-tackles-climate-change/
Nature.com https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-018-0108-y
Other less known sources https://techxplore.com/news/2021-09-agricultural-sector-capture-co2.html
https://e360.yale.edu/features/how-adding-rock-dust-to-soil-can-help-get-carbon-into-the-ground
Anyway if you go down this road, you’d realise some projects talk sense, but some funding has gone to non sense projects that effectively just say like “oh farming is growing plants, plants absorb CO2, we are naturally a carbon sink, daddy give me money”
Not really no, some nordinc countries with geothermal and tidal options on top of wind and solar maybe, anything larger than an island nation, cannot reach net zero without some form of carbon capture, even if electricity is fully renewable we will still need steel, cement, we’ll still have to refine metals for electronics and batters all of which emit GHG, so everyone has to use offset carbon somehow.
One way Iceland claims carbon neutrality is because they don’t produce a lot of steel, but if you look from a consumption point of view, how much steel Iceland consumes, I guarantee you, it will look worse.
Maybe USA should also do it, USA had close to 50% of lands covered with forests in late 1600s which is now only close to 20% it increased by 0.03%in the last decade. That would go a long way toward a net zero target.
Or they can buy into big agri and big pharma’s bullshit and keep giving them billions in subsidy to work on something that clearly is failing now as an option…
I don’t understand, 9 to 10 second delay reduction? Does it really matter that much?
People are already demonstrating by downvotes hahaha
They’re busy dealing with Indian spies carrying out operations on their soils.
This is good thing, fishermen have been claiming watercannon warfare for more than 5 years now, this is the first time government had accused, so it’s good thing.
But then if primary sources for Chinese government are unreliable why are the secondary sources from Chinese local newa agency acceptable? In that case even the secondary sources would be unreliable, where to draw the line?
Me and my cousin were both skiny af when entering teens, both of us bought these Jean jackets that fit us so well that we don’t remeber buying something that snug before, both of us were very proud of these and wore them all the time until one elder cousin noticed the flipped button side, started making fun of us and to top it off the tag on jackets had a very small 3 font size “for women” under the brand name.
We still get shamed for wearing that by other cousin.
Memories.
Aight mate, upvoated every single post for visibility.
I guess fuck apple. They knew legislation and they had 2.5 years. If they can’t meet its their problem, pay fines or make usb-c iPhone.
Xonotic ftw.
I was going to post more or less similar rant, but hey thanks for doing it. I second this @OP you hear this? This post just sounds like you don’t understand infinity that well.