Creator, Coder and Cutie 🦄 Power to the People Follow me on Mastodon if you give a fluff - @fcuks@mograph.social

  • 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle

  • Competelly agree with your points’ intention here, but if billionaires leave a country and take their wealth elsewhere, then it’s not being invested in that country, which is detrimental. Also they’re not spending money on luxury items or lots of whatever billionaire stuff, paying tax on that and circulating a portion of their wealth in that country etc.

    So it’s more like:

    billionaires stay in the country, spend and invest in the country and don’t pay tax vs billionaires leaves they dont spend invest, nor pay tax.

    My 50pence is there shouldn’t be billionaires in the first place, why does any one individual need that much wealth, it just accumulates more wealth and a lot gets hoarded away from anything productive.




  • This is all measured and not really estimated. If you think that any substantial chunk of that 484Billion is being done ‘stupidly’ then you’re just making presumptuous incorrect guesses without knowing much about the industry.

    Revenue (sales) - Investment (total costs) = ROI There is ROAS which similiar: Revenue - Ad Spend = ROAS You can measure things in more detail like CPA (cost per acquisition) to work out how much ad spend you have per sale, again this is a measurement not an estimation.

    Where previously there was mass advertisements to millions of people like TV or radio ads which were only affordable to large companies. Advertisers now can target the exact type of person they’re trying to market to for their niche which is a lot cheaper and so more accessible to smaller businesses. To me that makes business sense to do if I can optimise to the right ROI, and nothing to do with FOMO or vague thinking.