The coercion is the same. Neither can consent or both can. It’s literally the same power dynamic

You’ve made nothing clear because you’re still confused and can’t understand how both are the same. Read back through and try to strengthen your understanding

Both were fair choices made in free will or neither were. Don’t be a hypocrite, you’re better than that

Removed by mod

Neither could the other employee. They were both forced. Use your brain

So was she. So no rape, right?

Lots of places had muzzle mandates, lots of places didn’t. No difference in spread

People were forced to get the shot

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

That’s a lot of words to dance around the fact that there’s the same power dynamic in both situations. Just admit it already

Yeah let’s do all that as well as ban lockdowns and vaccine mandates

No valid studies have shown mask mandates to be effective, but that’s not even the topic. There are zero studies showing any reasoning behind the changes done to election rules. None are backed by science, so what was the reason?

The same power dynamic balance is in play in both situations. Just admit it

No power dynamic imbalance in the COVID case

There’s no power dynamic in losing your job? Glad to hear you also support zero protections on workers rights

Making the workplace unsafe

Off topic. The injections did not stop the spread

Neither could the person who was forced to get a different type of injection into their body in order to keep their job.

literally different cos the lady in your example couldn’t consent

She did consent. She consented to avoid losing her job. She wasn’t forced by your logic

literally no-one was forced to have the vaccine

By that logic, nobody in that story was raped. Or are you actually ignorant to the fact that people were fired if they didn’t get the injection?

So which is it? Can’t have it both ways

Exactly just like how people were forced to get the covid shots

I’ve heard this one before…