YouTube is free, accessible and innovative, though? That meme doesn’t make a lot of sense.

I guess your brain isn’t that developed after all. It’s making up relations that are not there in reality.

But your brain is so developed it can decide what’s good for others. Kindly shut up.

What makes you think that?

To be fair, they would just have to copy his name off of one of the several t-shirts they own/are currently wearing.

The failed one on Jan 6 but you already knew that and just act obtuse for some reason I’m sure makes perfect sense in your head.

Yes, it was already obvious you have a problem addressing a stupid thing you said. I’m sure you’re not really all that black and white, you’re just having a hard time being wrong and admitting it.

I asked for clarification on something you said. The context of my question is what you said, which is why I conveniently quoted it for you. My question does not relate to the general point you’re making but to this one sentence which I believe I made more than clear through my following-up questions. You seem to prefer to pretend not to understand that in order to worm out of the question, possibly because you’re aware that what you said is a slight exaggeration.

Also, what do you believe “catharsis” means?

It sounds like you possibly didn’t read my question. “Suffer” in what way, exactly? How do you read "‘Suffer’ in what way?’ and go on a tangent about renaming guns? Did you not say “This cosmetic shit is bullshit and just posturing to make gun owners suffer.”? Did I misinterpret what you said?

This cosmetic shit is bullshit and just posturing to make gun owners suffer.

“Suffer” in what way? Having to find a new hobby? Having to use a different boom toy instead of the cool boom toy they want to use? Those poor, poor gun owners!

Compared to the actual suffering of the dying kids and their parents, who do you think has it worse?

100% surge is legit

Well, neither are Catholics, so that works out.

Sarcasm works best for me when I have to explain that I’m using sarcasm. I just used sarcasm right there.

See?

If I say “the sun rises in the morning”, is that also an “implication of status and reasonability”? Do explain how a neutral statement implies “status and reasonability”. Go ahead!

Also explain what an “implication of fashion” is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I’d be surprised if that’s news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion.

You also failed to show how I said anything about something being “inherently attractive”. Try to keep up with your own accusations, please.

If you’re going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said.

I don’t believe I made any comment about what’s “inherently attractive” or “reasonable” to “wear on your face”. What’s with the loaded question?

And yet men go for the women with long eyelashes. Just because men aren’t aware of it doesn’t mean the women’s moves don’t work.

But even if they didn’t, imagine this: Women can change the way they look entirely without wanting to look hotter for men. Shocking, I know.

How many variations of this joke do we really need, though?

Thanks for the clarification, I didn’t know all those details.

Also don’t forget to mention it at every opportunity. The rapist Donald Trump must be called exactly that so people don’t forget we’re talking about a convicted rapist who for some reason is not a registered sex offender which, of course, doesn’t mean he’s any less of a rapist, which Donald Trump verifiably is.

The rapist Donald J. Trump indeed raped E. Jean Carroll but the sex with Stormy Daniels was consensual.