Do this as an institution you’ll get nuked in court.

Do this as an individual nobody will pay to see it.

The more you complain the more it’s worth.

People pay money to see it because it’s controversial.

That’s why it’s art.

I bet USB c connections could fit in a floppy drive slot

I pay for services (including lemmy - support your instance leeches) and use an ad blocker for everything else.

???

There’s a lower cost ad plan for YouTube music is that what you mean?

I thought everyone wanted YouTube premium without the music. That’s the ad plan: it shows ads on music because you’re not paying for ad free music.

The problem is obvious and it’s one that even the companies making the LLMs want to solve so they don’t poison their models.

However the solution is absurd. Watermarking plain text is just not going to work. Any edits would change the signature.

When the title is “best Lemmy app” and the body is just “which Lemmy app do you use for Android and why” you can understand why someone would just scroll through and contribute their experience with Sync right?

Just like every other link aggregator: people on All don’t pay attention to the specific community.

It’s not malice, just people being oblivious. It’s not worth getting worked up about.

I think 19 reuses of a single rocket is more impressive here TBH

Prisons are a nuanced topic that cannot be boiled down to categorical statements, but I’ll do my best here to clarify.

You have 2 different cases for prisons: prisons as a concept and prisons in reality.

Conceptually prisons serve 2 important roles: separation and rehabilitation. Both roles are important for the continued functioning of society. You cannot have a functioning society with no separation of criminals from the population. Similarly without rehabilitation the separation needs to be permanent. In some cases there is no rehabilitating someone, so life sentences exist.

In reality: only a very small subset of prisons match the conceptual purpose because there is still a strong group of voters who think a prison should be a punishment.

To consider a specific case, let’s take the infamous US prison system. In the United States rehabilitation is the exception, not the norm. Beyond that the carceral system has perverse incentives to perform that role of societal separation on the maximum number of humans possible without concern for innocence. It’s not an accountable system and it is not democratic.

Even with those perverse incentives: you still have prisoners in prison who would need to be there even in the most perfect system. Plenty of people in prison need to be there. The system fails to rehabilitate them and only serves to separate them from society, but that role of separation is an important one.

I’d argue that the US prison system is overwhelmingly negative for the society but it still performs a core societal role. Despite that: I personally know excons who have had dramatic changes from time served and are better people for the experience. Some percentage of the population benefits.

I don’t buy into anarchist utopian handwaving that states that prisons aren’t necessary: people suck and would suck regardless of governmental style.

Does that help clarify?

11 years? Nevermind use the laptop for sure haha

You’ll probably save money in the long run using a pi.

spending time in most of the world’s prisons still break your mental health in ways that will only make reintegration back into society harder in the end.

True only in specific cases: mostly your statement is bullshit.

There are far, far too many innocent people in prison: far too many who never deserve to be there. Many who fit the description of harder to reintegrate after the experience.

But prison absolutely can be the right thing for some. There are criminals who will not reintegrate without reform, and the prison system serves that purpose in more enlightened countries. Look at recidivism rates outside of the US to see how some people can reform with time away from society.

We need prisons. I expect 90% of people in prison are worse off from the experience but that 10% is important to society.

Driverless transport is a huge boon to a transit system.

If you put it into an XML parser it will throw an error, so it’s no longer XML.

Sure it was based on it, but it’s not xml.

Not XML. JSX. It’s javascript’s answer to markup.

1. Emergence is the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. That’s the original meaning of emergent properties, which is laid out in the first paragraph of the article. It’s the scholarly usage as well, and what the claims of observed emergence are using as the base of their claim.

2. The article very explicitly demonstrated that only about 10% of any of the measures for LLMs displayed any emergence and that illusory emergence was the result of overly rigid metrics. Swapping to edit distance as an approximately close metric causes the sharp spikes to disappear for obvious reasons: no longer having a sharp yes/no allows for linear progression to reappear. It was always there, merely masked by flawed statistics.

If you can’t be bothered to read here’s a very easy to understand video by one of the authors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypKwNrmuuPM

Here’s a white paper explicitly proving:

No emergent properties (illusory due to bad measures)

Predictable linear progress with model size

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004

The field changes fast, I understand it is hard to keep up

Their paper uses industry standard definitions

Here’s a white paper explicitly proving:

1. No emergent properties (illusory due to bad measures)
2. Predictable linear progress with model size

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004

The field changes fast, I understand it is hard to keep up

Sure thing: here’s a white paper explicitly proving:

1. No emergent properties (illusory due to bad measures)
2. Predictable linear progress with model size

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004

Unless you want to call your predictive text on your keyboard a mind you really can’t call an LLM a mind. It is nothing more than a linear progression from that. Mathematically proven to not show any form of emergent behavior.