Actual author, actual book

Got that one? I wouldn’t mind having it or helping out

deleted by creator

These are the temps in the notoriously cold Minnesota as well. I’m unsettled and upset.

I mean that it was easy. It was low handing fruit. It basically shouted “I’m a leftist” on its own.

This one was basically a freebie

Others have expanded, but it may be useful to try to break out of the typical idea of ownership.

Isn’t ranked choice just the single candidate version? Like, you don’t get proportional representation with a presidential election

Well, make love under the stars, I suppose

Oh that’s bullshit

That doesn’t incorporate the hassle factor. Even if you can, it’s a lot more hassle

I know it’s not, but kinda looks like a shower curtain hook

In this case it’s “Ingress Protection” rating - as in how well it prevents water and dust from getting inside the phone when exposed.

Edit: since I’m on hold and bored, here’s the Bard description of the rating system

The Ingress Protection (IP) rating system is a two-digit code that tells you how well an enclosure is protected against dust and water. Here’s a quick breakdown:

• First digit: This is for solid objects, like dust, fingers, or tools. It goes from 0 (no protection) to 6 (dust-tight).
• Second digit: This is for water, like splashes, rain, or immersion. It goes from 0 (no protection) to 9 (protected against high-pressure water jets).

So, an IP67 rating means the device is dust-tight and can withstand being submerged in water for a short time.

Here are some real-world examples:

• IP44: Splashproof phone, suitable for light rain or spills.
• IP65: Dustproof camera, good for outdoor use but not submersion.
• IPX7: Waterproof smartwatch, can survive a dunk in the pool.
• IP68: Rugged phone, can handle being underwater for extended periods.

Remember, IP ratings are just guidelines. Always check the manufacturer’s instructions for specific usage advice.

Person above Epstein

Nah, take the W for the moment

Idk what med this is supposed to be but if I have a pill that feels like it’s sticking on the way down, I chase it with a handful of peanut M&M’s and that seems to do the trick. Plus I get an excuse to eat candy in the morning.

I’m not convinced it’s a defect. For it to be a defect, it has to be unintentional and unwanted. There’s nothing at this point to suggest it was unintentional, and it doesn’t have any impact on my experience using it, therefore it’s not unwanted. It’s entirely benign.

They’ll vote anyway - and possibly face legal action for that - which will just be them perpetuating their suffering yet again

Okay, I own one. In fact I’m typing this on it. I’ll answer my own questions. I can see the “bumps” if I look at an extreme angle with the screen off when it’s under a light. They’re not visible with the screen on, and they’re below the screen so there’s nothing to feel. It does seem like a non issue unless something changes. This whole thing feels overblown because “Google bad”

Do you own one? Can you see the bumps with the screen on? The screen doesn’t have to look good when it’s off - there’s nothing to look at then. It just has to look good when it’s on.