Marshant… chef’s kiss

I’m in the dark here

That’s a feature in Mastodon not a bug 🙃 /s.

But but… The Gooooooogles!

Wait till they hear about the HA-RAM proxy… For when your memory needs to be available now!

Do you think anything this administration has done was thoroughly thought out and considered or plain reactionary and for mass media consumption?

From what we’ve seen this past year of Biden he seems more interested in visiting ice cream parlours and having an absolutely shit foreign policy.

I don’t think he understands the words even when they’re coming out of his own mouth.

That’s not how fund managers work. They make money they charge you. They lose money they charge you. They don’t make money they charge you. Oh and then there’s the standing charge for the service. YOLO.

I’m not a finance guy but I agree with this statement.

Dey took arrr jeeerbs!

I think, for once, you should be humble and accept that… maybe… just maybe… this medically qualified material scientist shit posting on the internet knows what they are saying.

I can try, but only to say the tapping behaviour wasn’t intuitive. Depending where you tapped the comments would either collapse and expand or the vote controls would disappear. The tapping difference seemed, at first, quite similar (as in the tap area and sensitivity was really close and extremely high) so I had a hard time understanding what I was doing to cause these behaviours. What confused me more was that the behaviour between the home page and a thread didn’t seem consistent at first which made it harder to understand.

Like I said I’m used to it now but it took me a while to get there where as I was expecting something like the following:

• Tap on a minus symbol to collapse.
• Minus symbol turns into a plus symbol to expand.
• Why do the vote controls need to disappear at all?

The tapping areas are, weirdly, super precise and not very intuitive or well explained. I would have gotten used to it but as a new user this was incredibly frustrating.

It’s fine if Apple steals though. However if a Chinese company does this, then woah woah woah hol’ up!

Oh I know… I wasn’t being serious. 😁

The part where you didn’t understand what I said, misinterpreted it so badly, assumed something that wasn’t implied, and went on a rant equating people with dangerous severe mental illness (as in the kid in the article) to people in the creative arts.

Oh and also the Joan of Arc thing. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

LOL wut? 🤣

They need to go to the EU and get them to intervene! Only the EU can stand up to apple.

Sounds like he had serious issues in life and wouldn’t likely be able to hold a job or complete a scholarship. Not to mention he’s ruined any form of trust you would need to be a security consultant.

A mental health assessment used as part of the sentencing hearing said he “continued to express the intent to return to cyber-crime as soon as possible. He is highly motivated.”

The jury was told that while he was on bail for hacking Nvidia and BT/EE and in police protection at a Travelodge hotel, he continued hacking

This doesn’t sound like a kid that accidentally found some loopholes in a website and got lost down a rabbit hole. Instead it sounds like he deliberately knew what he was doing was wrong but didn’t give a shit and was quite happy to blackmail users why threatening to reveal their personal data he had stolen.

Let’s hope they can reform him over time, poor kid.

Very well trolled. 👏 Bravo young man, bravo.

I’m not trying to argue with you 😔. I’m trying to have a conversation with you. There’s no need to be like that.

Doing anything but keeping them is crackhead behavior, it’s like ripping copper pipes out of your walls and selling them to keep your electricity turned on. A society has failed if it reaches that point.

I’m sorry but this wildly over simplifying the issue to the point that the copper pipe analogy and hyperbolic language isn’t useful. I respectfully hard disagree with this characterisation for the reasons I’ve explained in my other reply.

Putting a will (or anything other legal documents) on paper must have seemed totally natural hundreds of years ago but at some point we need to accept that we have different needs for these documents and different ways of capturing them.

I totally agree with you about security. That should be a principle in all of this. But that shouldn’t constrain us to recording on paper. If security is paramount then design a system whereby you can verify the veracity and authenticity of the digital document and create secured controls around their handling - hint these systems already exist today. Tampering and theft is certainly an issue but realistically so is it if you still had paper. It’s not uncommon for paper to burn, I have been told 😉.

Any system is fallible, but that shouldn’t mean we remove it from consideration.