That’s because that’s how you see the world. It’s hard for you to comprehend someone else not thinking the same way you do.

And was a slightly disobedient puppy.

Truth is the Ford Pinto was kind of hard targeted. They were roughly on par with similar vehicles at the time, certainly not the worst offender. Very similar to how tesla is being targeted.

^bet anyone that downvotes won’t even do a bare minimum Wikipedia read of the Pinto issue^

If you tell sometime ten minutes, they might put it under for only a couple minutes and call it good enough. Tell them 30 and they’re more likely to hit 10+ minutes.

“If I frame my blatant racism as supposedly a compliment it can’t be racism right?”

Sure it’s slightly better than openly hating and denigrating a race, but it’s still racist. They don’t understand this.

The idiots do not understand what any of this means. Let me repeat that. THEY DON’T FUCKING UNDERSTAND WHAT ANY OF THIS MEANS. A bill could use the plainest and simplest language spelling out how it’s going to double all other taxes, and these mouth breathing idiots would still celebrate the “no tax on tips” shit.

And how does anyone vote for something that’s 99-1 unless you happen to be the first? Some things you should make a principled stand sure, but that’s not this.

I predict with immigration crack downs we’ll eventually see some more resistance to that. At some point, either by ambush or chance occurrence, ICE agents will be attacked and possibly killed. Trump will horrifically overstep in his response. Then it will just be escalating responses.

The one way Bernie could still win the Dem nomination in 2016.

I really wish some reporters had played along and started asking him random questions like how can we achieve world peace or his thoughts on whatever world news was random at the time.

Never seen a MAGAt type? That’s a pretty solid facsimile of their wierd random capitalizing.

I gotta ask, what’s the situation with the senate? It would seem like a colossal lack of communication if the house bans it but the senate doesn’t. Or if the senate already banned it, why the house didn’t then? Shouldn’t they be relatively on the same page?

Pretty sure they can tell the method used when disengaging fsd/ap. So they would know if it was manually turned off or if the system lost enough info and shut it down. They should be able to tell within a few seconds if accuracy the order of events. I can’t imagine a scenario that wouldn’t be blatantly obvious where the tesla was able to determine an accident was imminent and shut off fsd/ap wroth enough time to “blame it on the driver”. What might be possible is that the logs show fsd shut off like a millisecond before impact/event and then someone merely reported that fsd was not engaged at the time of the accident. Technically true and tesla lawyers might fight like hell to maintain that theory, but if an independent source is able to review the logs, I don’t see that being a possibility.

It should be easy. I can count to twenty and a half if I take my pants off. How hard could counting terrorism be?

The bots will just come up with something fake to scan and carry on as they always have.

Like a real human eye? Is this how Skynet starts?

He can insert whatever he wants if he’s leaving me a portion of his fortune.

Haven’t watched the last season but all land grabs so far have been portrayed as defensive. If they had been left alone they wouldn’t be lashing out. As a politician John did illegal things specifically to stop a corporation from developing open land.

We’re good on OPSEC.

Praise Jeena!

Added an example