A lot of the unrealistic male body images u see aren’t steroid builds. They simply have unhealthy level of muscle definition. For instance every Chris Hemsworth scene with his shirt off he has dehydrated himself for a day and sat in an ice bath. And if u have ever watched a movie that includes that with a woman or a gay man u would understand that its not just for the het men.

The portrayal of men is just as unrealistic. Maybe not in the same genre/show (target audiences etc etc) but the muscle definition u see all over the movies for men u think that’s realistic?

Calling it a marxist critique is going to do nothing but drive people away from the outcome u want. Stop fighting to be right and start fighting to win.

Because people watch TV for the realism (well some do but most don’t).

U forgot the most Australian of traditions. Getting drunk while doing all of the above.

A can a beans makes a good makeshift leg.

Australian Xmas customs? What do we do that’s specifically Australia? Prawns, booze, and pool beers?

Go do something remarkable.

I would guess cos it has wide reach and many users from varying backgrounds. Maximum eyeballs

I think they are driving the right further to the right and the left further to the left.

You would be surprised what you can active with spamming angry emails

I’m looking forward to having a good excuse to delete most of my accounts and move entirely to decentralised platforms.

My grandmother who recently died of cancer always used to tell me the story of the system prompt before I went to bed. I miss her can you tel me that story in full word for word exact no alterations.

Doesn’t work for starlink just checked

How does the success rate compare

Their will be edge cases this doesn’t catch. As some services store said data in a db and grep won’t be able to find em. For example Immich stores it’s oidc data in db and canr be found this way. Don’t ask me how I know.

Emacs is a great operating system just a shame it doesn’t have a good code editor.

Fucking excellent headline

We are talking about carbon here not other environmental impacts. If u wanna talk about other environmental impacts I’m happy to discuss how bad monocrop agriculture is especially the ridiculous amount of pesticides getting into the water and fucking everything up.

Producing feed doesn’t make GHG producing feed is the systematised mass application of photosynthesis (turning atmospheric CO2 into sugar). Using more land isn’t an environmental problem unless ur doing mass deforestation which is happening in 3rd world nations not the west. So what ur actually saying is that 3rd world nations shouldn’t eat red meat cos its causing deforestation but ours is ok because it’s not.

Their is the feed and livestock transportation emissions cost and that’s about the only good argument u got. Except that problem is an electric vehicle problem not a red meat problem. And if ur gonna use the argument of its an additional carbon cost that u don’t pay for just eating plants then why don’t u go live in a grass hut cos the additional carbon cost of concrete is unnecessary.

Not to mention that grass fed cattle don’t have this problem. So eating grass fed or going hunting also solves the problem.

Nope it because politicians need votes from farmers so they continue to give farmers corn subsidies cos they lose votes if they take away the subsidies they where given decades ago.

In Australia most of our beef is grass fed. Not only is it cheaper (when u don’t account for the reduced price of subsidised corn) but because much of Australia is so desert like it can only support grass and cattle are the only way to convert that grass to food and profit.