He claimed he heard somebody say something.

How the fuck is a prosecution going to disprove that?

His claims aren’t real enough for people to call it lies, the very same reason why sensible people don’t find what he said worth anything on its own.

Lol the irony, and what kind of threat? You are seriously pathetic to try and play a victim in that discussion.

This reads like somebody who thinks they’ve taken care of themselves but has had everything handed to them through life imo.

Only a child thinks riding on their parents insurance plans thinks they are getting a fair deal in today’s health insurance.

laborers being fairly compensated is socialism

Dude you can’t survive as a boot licking parasite for very long. Eventually the boot steps.

What pathetic ideology do you believe in that it excludes a fair wage for workers?

Lol, the bill is literally a piece of paper backed by other pieces of paper that the richest people on the planet demand have value because they choose who has the paper they hand out.

What you mean to say is, the labor must be done, and it is. The part you refuse to accept is the laborers must have a sustainable life and they don’t.

Removed by mod

The irony.

His bad faith “i don’t know what I said” shtick is just as shitty as your play the victim bullshit.

Get fucked loser

That doesn’t line up with a single person’s version of the story.

He says he was locked up for looking gay, Turkey claims they locked him up for being at a pride event.

Neither of those are public displays of affection.

Bootlicker

Try reading the link you shared and reading your comment bright guy.

Did you seriously make claims about poll data without checking your source?

But under what factual basis are you discarding a 900 person sample size?

I dont remember polls insisting Clinton would win, I remember dumb people saying thats what polls said, and your source makes me not feel shifted in that opinion.

A 3% margin on a poll in no way is declaring total victory to anybody.

Many of the polls you just shared have a 1% difference in support rate.

So you think a 1% better polling rate is " declared total victory for Clinton" but feel confident in discarding a 900 person sample?

If there was 10k people in the polls ypu are referencing, you are using 900 people as proof of absolute victory lol.

He claims he didn’t participate.

So do we believe the people who lock people up for being gay or the gay dude thrown in prison for 20 days for looking gay?

What sample size do ypu think would be appropriate?

Your comments have doubled since he left his comment, so yes.

I wasn’t really going into the context of nutrition as much as I was discussing energy production.

There’s good information to be found in this further analysis, but it relies on fine points of data that I didn’t want to get bogged down on.

My concept is more just efficiency of energy production over pollution rate. Good details though, so thank you.

Quote the name of the person who brought up almond milk for me?

Sure dude. Go for it.

Since I can’t respond to your other dumb comment, I’m not the one who brought up almond milk in the almond milk vs cow milk discussion ypu thought ypu were so brilliant in chiming in on lol

Because you measure energy of food in calories, and we are comparing produced value of good over pollution. Why would you not?

Actually, the original comment was doing that, I was sarcastically making the same comment to point out how dumb it is and you are picking and choosing when its okay to do this based on your biases.

You are factually incorrect on point 2 and point 1 was already addressed in my comment.