Outwordly trans people make up like 1% of the population. So one incident could screw with the stats more than you’d like.

I don’t think it would, especially if you look at it over a period of time.

It could definitely be misrepresented, but anyone with the intellectual curiosity to look at ratios would probably be less likely to misrepresent it.

Even by population ratios, that’s gotta be really rare.

Not in my area. “Air support” hasn’t been a thing where I play in a while. But it’s not a super dense area where I usually play.

just the knowledge that cameras were disabled in that area would be as damning as any video.

I wish it worked that way. Logically yes, but not in court (as far as I’m aware). At least not when the offending officer is on the stand

It’s useful for when you’re quoting someone who happens to use the exact same intonation as you!

I’m some jurisdictions, public urination can put you on a sex offender registry.

It wouldn’t even matter if you’re trying to be discreet and just have to go but there’s no public washrooms around.

Countries that pay to little and are non demorcratic and don’t allow for various rights would have big tarriffs and ones with all those things would have like zero.

Medium ones for the US, got it!

He’s a whole lot more than a speck of dust in the grand scheme of a person’s life.

Even just his 8 years is about 10% for most people. Then you have to add on the extra years of trailing effects…

From all the apps invading your privacy and abusing your data, I didn’t suspect Pokemon GO to be one of them.

I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic.

Even if you never played the game, it’s fairly common knowledge that it uses GPS data to place in-game elements and to track where players are.

The game also uses real-world locations as in-game “treasure chests”, which people were theorizing all the way back in 2016 would eventually become open to “sponsored” locations. (Every McDonalds where I am is now a PokeStop)

And if you’ve played the game, you’ve likely seen all the invitations to turn on your camera and submit photos (which are tied to your GPS), move to specific locations, walk (or create) walking routes, take short videos of landmarks, etcetcetc.

I’ve been playing on and off since 2016, and I’ve known I’ve been trading data in exchange for a low-cost game this whole time.

I’m not sure if it’s “most [of the] hardcore players”, or “[the] most hardcore players”.

In the circles I’m around, spoofing is still frowned upon.

I’m not American, but fewer guns would still be nice

Sorry, I’m not American.

But you’re just starting now? How would you know how easy it is or isn’t already?

Ok, I presume you’re American since you know how easy it’d be.

How far along are you in your plan for the general strike?

Tariffs on gun powder, maybe? On whatever metals make guns?

Most people don’t “get” poetry.

Did you channel your edgy 15 year old self for that? That’s incredibly arrogant and self absorbed.

Lol, that was what the study implied.

If I’m remembering correctly, one of the reasons that participants of the study rated human-written poetry more poorly was because it was “more difficult to understand”. Conversely, the AI-generated poetry was easier to understand.

And this is coming from someone who doesn’t read poetry, lol

Like I said, I think we should still have money. I just think the basic necessities should be guaranteed.

Nobody should have to do a job that’s horrible to them just because they need shelter and food.

If that horrible job needs someone, they need to offer enough money to be able to incentivize people to do it, and not just because the worker doesn’t want to starve or be homeless.

It doesn’t appeal to the masses.

Most people don’t “get” poetry. That’s why you don’t see many people sitting around reading books of poetry.

Many people would probably also choose a short story written by AI over one written by a professional author.

Heck, I’m sure comments written by AI generally get more upvotes than comments written by humans.

How many people would even turn up to work if it made no material difference to their life?

Maybe not the same jobs, but most people would. Human beings are wired to want to feel productive.

I don’t think we should be abolishing money or anything, and different jobs should pay different wages. Still, I think all people should have their basic needs met.

Yes, because knives and vehicles were invented and designed to kill things…/s lol

Definitely. It’s not even about defending Nintendo.

I hate people who try to profit off of privacy when piracy is available for free.

It reminds me of my university days when people would be selling PDFs of course textbooks…just email a copy of the file!