would you let a 30-year-old candidate or a foreign-born candidate take part hoping that they would be beaten at the polls? Obviously not.

Well that’s one way to deter car usage in future generations.

You could almost call it a “war on motorists”, Mr Sunak?

They did have a trial - that’s how it got appealed

“buy”

deleted by creator

it would be “nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land” - commented the lawyer

Mary’s book?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_Much_and_Never_Enough

now? Paul Merton on HIGNFY was mocking it at least as far back as 2016

V1 was a much larger pulsejet (hence the buzz) with a third of the range and ten times the payload of this thing

The soldiers saw some (unarmed, shirtless) people and one of them immediately said “terrorists!”. That’s the level of analysis that’s going on when making kill decisions here.

“please decide an amount that would prevent anyone in a similar situation as the defendant from doing this again”

(defendent literally repeats the defamatory statement at the entrance to the courtroom)

Jury: “well shit. we need to exponentiate this dollar value”

“After the verdict, Giuliani said he didn’t testify because he was worried the judge would find him in contempt, and complained that he hadn’t been allowed to enter evidence that his allegations were true, despite his not having turned over any such evidence before trial”

Just wow. Guess there’s a difference between what you’re willing to tell a reporter on the street and what you’re willing to tell the judge in court?

That’s way above the “tens of millions” that some commentators were predicting based off the filings - maybe they didn’t include the punitive damages? Or did the judge cause a surprise with the number?

“Expanded Security Maintenance for Applications is not enabled. See ubuntu.com/esm or run sudo pro status”

deleted by creator

problem here was that Google was doing deals to undermine those things

problem with wormholes is that you can send information into the past - so if you receive a message, does that mean you’re predetermined to subsequently send that message?

and how hackers being able to change train software is in any way a less-damaging thing to claim!

deleted by creator

Subhead: “apparently they’re being serious” - The Register knows what people think!