A line break doesnt have to be electronic only. You just… start a new line on the paper.

If it were somehow legally allowed, the sanitization would be incorrect.

That’s good to know! Glad to hear it’s working for you

It’s documented in early human works and there’s nobody who wrote about discovering it in those early human works.

Actually, nobody discovered it until this chef guy apparently.

What’s holding me back is that I’m worried the fold line would be too distracting, or would get worse over time.

I also love my s23 pen

Did he really though?

Sliced or mashed avocado has been eaten on some sort of bread, flatbread, or tortilla (often heated or toasted) since humans first started consuming bread and avocados, and before any documented or written history.

According to The Washington Post, chef Bill Granger may have been the first person to put avocado toast on a modern café menu in 1993 in Sydney,[9] although the dish is documented in Brisbane, Australia, as early as 1929

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avocado_toast

You could be right, but I’m not alleging they would use cell.

Presumably the smart appliance already has wireless capabilities like WiFi/BLE. And then it’s just a software exercise on how to code an interface between devices of the same manufacturer.

Ludicrous R&D?

Ultrasound is used by Microsoft teams, some apps use it to transmit data between phones. Back in the day there was a chrome app to transfer links.

Amazon sidewalk already connects devices together. Samsung Smart things already bridges Samsung devices. Apple Air tags already use “primary” Internet connected devices to transmit data about “secondary” devices.

None of this is new tech, it’s all feasible.

We won’t have other one*

*While the generations affected are alive.

Once the living memories are gone it’s much harder to prevent, since anyone can argue a stance from a history book.

Something that can be done easily and may be done in the future, if it hasn’t been discovered yet

Clandestine methods have been known since the 2000s. We know they’re scummy and want our data. Why does this seem too crazy?

There’s a dozen ways they could jump the air gap.

Ultrasonic to a phone or Alexa/Siri/etc, connect to an unsecured network, send data to a neighbor’s smart TV which is connected to Internet, Bluetooth or other to a phone

There’s these peaky things called “seasons” where the amount of sunlight fluctuates, sometimes dramatically based on latitude

No, it’s a recall by definition.

A recall is issued when a manufacturer or NHTSA determines that a vehicle, equipment, car seat, or tire creates an unreasonable safety risk or fails to meet minimum safety standards.

Safety issue: door opens during a crash

Manufacturers are required to fix the problem by repairing it, replacing it, offering a refund, or in rare cases repurchasing the vehicle.

Repair: software patch

That’s exactly how air tags work currently.

There’s a pretty good chance they’ll get around it- if they aren’t already.

Samsung TV? You have a Samsung phone? There’s an easy way to jump the air gap.

Neighbor has a TV connected to the Internet? Send data to that TV and pretend you’re not connected to anything so the user doesn’t catch on.

And Russia is trying reunification with Ukraine. What’s your point?

IIRC from a previous thread, different law enforcement agencies will release hashes or similar so the image can be detected without distributing the original

I mean I’m sure someone honestly believes that. But to be fair, people believe the earth is flat.

100% agree, society is so radically different today from even 200 years ago.

Most discernable minor changes from evolution are from 10+ thousand years ago. Major changes are more on the order of 100k-millions of years.

We’re 100% not “made for” the world we’ve created.

Just linking to an article about collective decision making isn’t really that helpful without quoting the article for your points.

So that article you posted talks about animal behavior, and that an economic view on collective decision making is a good approach for animal behavior.

As motivated in the Introduction, our review has focused primarily on an economic view on collective decision-making. The economic view is a staple of behavioural ecology, and motivates the tools of optimal decision theory for the study of animal behaviour.

Nowhere did they make the conclusion that collecting decision making is superior, especially in the context of humans.

Could we reasonably expect an AI to something right 100% if a human could do it with 100%?

Could you tell if someone has down syndrome pretty obviously?

Maybe some kind of feature exists that we aren’t aware of