Verse ancap Brazilian doomer

  • 1 Post
  • 35 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 28th, 2023

help-circle




  • ancap shark@lemmy.todaytolinuxmemes@lemmy.world:wq!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why are these hard to understand editors still the default on most distros and flavors

    I think nano is usually the default nowdays. Nano os pretty minimal and has it’s keybinds always on display so you don’t need to memorize them.

    Why haven’t they reinvented themselves with easier to understand shortcuts?

    Nothing about vim and alternatives feels intuitive or easy to use

    (Neo)vim doesn’t need to reinvent itself to be more accessible, because it does what it does very well. I’m a web dev and have used vscode like anybody else for a long time. I decided to try neovim because vscode was performing badly, but kept me using it because of how good the developer experience is. Once you learned how to use it, there is just nothing better.

    but when every other software with keyboard shortcuts agrees on certain easy to remember standards, I don’t quite understand how software that goes against all of that hasn’t been replaced or hasn’t reinvented itself in newer versions

    In a way, it has been replaced. Most people will use a user friendly IDE and ignore vim. The thing about vim is that it does things in a fundamentally different way than any other editor, so reinventing itself would mean loosing everything that makes it good, then you better off using something else.

    Then again, I have no idea what the difference between vi, vim, emacs, and nano are

    Nano is a simple, easy terminal text editor; vi, vim and neovim are three versions of the same quirky and hard, but very good text editor/IDE; emacs is a quirky, but kinda bad editor that has amazingly good extendability.








  • I’m a libertarian in Brazil, so my takes may be different from yours (I’m not even sure if the word means the same thing for me and for native English speakers).

    This is the far right libertarianism, which has essentially become an extremist, authoritarian form of capitalism. In essence, those with immense power tell us that nobody has any right to oversight and regulation over others. Their power becomes insurmountable, and their control over the economy becomes absolute. We live according to the standards they provide, because we have no alternative.

    Big corporations (which, I agree, are a cancer to society) lobby regulatory powers to weaken local and mid business and to evade taxes in ways small business simply can’t, that’s the source of their power. A lack of government regulation would not be good for them, because it would empower their competition, and that’s the last thing they want.

    I don’t see how any system could succeed, considering the circumstances.

    To me, the big problem with libertarianism is that it requires a big level of maturity from the population. It requires private regulatory and certification companies, union of workers to seek working rights in a non-violent way, and people to support charity initiatives that help the poor and endangered. All of that is not impossible, but people are very used to that being a government responsibility, it won’t happen over night


  • As a libertarian, I don’t trust these billionaires a single bit to do it.

    They are not libertarians, they don’t care about the free market, small local business, regulatory and certification companies, or what else. They are very happy to lobby the government to enforce any anticompetitive practices that will benefit them in the long run. They probably just want a new way to evade taxes, they don’t give two fucks about libertarianism.

    Sadly, tech bros won’t see through it and will hype anything these clowns do.