How about both?
I’d expect the design to take into account this kind of issue, they’re only one of the most valuable companies in the world, surely they can afford some QA.
How about both?
I’d expect the design to take into account this kind of issue, they’re only one of the most valuable companies in the world, surely they can afford some QA.
Until the GPU cooks itself anyway, because nvidia can’t admit their new power connector was a mistake.
This sounds like FUD. Do you have a source for that?
Before that, they claimed they were simply too insignificant to even be eligible for VAT.
How is this FUD when you just said they admitted to it?
Exemptions vary by country, but often they only apply to small businesses.
Often there’s no right to any exemptions anyway if your company isn’t headquartered in the country (and Kagi is from USA).
Either way you only have to pay VAT on transactions made after you go over the limit, while Kagi admitted they have to settle unpaid taxes.
This situation can only happen if they didn’t pay the taxes they already legally owed.
See: https://kagifeedback.org/d/3592-march-19th-2024-introducing-sales-taxes
Kagi will have to retroactively pay for all sales tax/VAT that we did not collect in the last almost two years. We have chosen to absorb this on behalf of our customers.
They tried to make themselves look like the good guys, while in reality they just paid back their overdue taxes they were required to collect all this time.
Not knowing the tax rules is not an excuse.
If they wanna do business internationally they can afford to hire an accountant.
Information on this is extremely intransparent however, so this might be wrong.
It’s not “extremely intransparent”, it’s just a little complicated.
And accountants are really cheap for small businesses.
I also liked the part where they decided they don’t need to pay the VAT.
I thought coups are generally illegal and involve a military action.
This just looks like a legally elected politician doing exactly what he promised.
It may not be good things, but none of that was unexpected.
I don’t think being open matters here, it’s the part where it’s developed by big bad China.
All of these threats apply to other LLMs as well.
I was in a similar situation, I just told them I’m cancelling the account when they added the extra charge for extra users, and they’re free to make their own account if they want.
There was a bit of complaining, but it turns out no one missed Netflix enough to come back.
Yeah, I tried it for a bit 1 or 2 years ago and didn’t see much difference.
Only cool thing was the automatic summaries with sources, but the I found out LLM summaries are like everything else “AI” - unreliable, at best, so…
And besides… aren’t AI features getting pushed in Kagi heavily?
Weird idea to use it as an argument against Google and DDG, but conveniently ignore it for Kagi.
I mean… when did it stop being huge?
It’s just back to business as usual.
I’m sure that’s not gonna get misused. /s
I’m not a fan of LLMs, but an app has absolutely no business deciding what input method I use.
This feels too similar to completely idiotic practice of blocking the copy-paste of credentials and disallowing password managers in certain apps/websites.
Yes, and another big difference is that Bottles refuses to provide any kind of help to package maintainers.
According to maintainers’ comments on the Github project, they have to figure out how to build it by trial and error.
I was actually really surprised that there’s isn’t any kind of build documentation.
It’s pretty unusual.
I don’t think it’s understandable in this case, no.
The entire project depends on Wine, imagine if Wine devs restricted Bottles in what way they are allowed to use it just because Wine project doesn’t want to deal with bugs potentially introduced by the Bottles dev.
But they won’t, because of the license.
And neither can the Bottles devs.
If they want to have total control over their source code, fine, but then they cannot claim to be open-source and release it under GPL.
It’s kinda shitty, but after reading the other links in the post I can’t say it’s very surprising.
Bottles devs seem weirdly hostile to the idea of anyone repackaging their software, because apparently they’re the only ones that are able to do it properly.
edit: devs also refuse bug reports from any version that’s not Flatpak, so in this context removing the button doesn’t seem that unreasonable.
edit2: now that I’ve had a closer look at the PR mentioned in the post I’m not surprised at all.
Bottles devs are actively hostile. Apparently with this PR it’s impossible to run Bottles outside Flatpak without the package maintainers patching the code.
It’s going to be really difficult in a standard setup.
If you really care maybe try something like Tails.
Holy shit, this company is based in France and they’re publicly doxxing their users in the replies.
I don’t even know what to say, under GDPR they’re extra fucked now.
In my case it refused to ever mark me as idle, which meant I never got any notifications on mobile…
Works fine with a plugin, so clearly it can’t be that hard.
Did they also finally fix the AFK detection on Wayland?
It’d be funny if the other companies caught in the crossfire now sued those LaLiga assholes for blocking their services.