deleted by creator

Yep, some are also only while the vehicle is in motion. So feel free to watch a video at a stopsign or set of lights.

I did, you clearly haven’t read mine. Your comment has nothing to do with their post, it’s not about objects it’s about the arbitrary distinction we’ve applied to them.

The thoughts not about objects though it’s about the arbitrary distinction we’ve made, so I really don’t see why that matters here?

Some states don’t even have laws to dissuade their use.

Pardon? We already have multiple different ways to express numbers, they are completely arbitrary. Why would alternate universes not have different ways to express numbers, like we already do?

Which facts do you speak of?

If you look at a single item, why do we call it 1? Why not 2? Why not 3? Because it’s arbitrary and the numbers are an expression of what we see. So yes in alternate universes 3 can be between 1 and 2. Since the expression of numbers is meaningless.

You realize the numbers are arbitrary and every universe will have different terms, phrases and orders for these completely arbitrary “numbers” yeah?

What facts do you speak of?

In another universe 2 would be 3 so 3 would be between 1 and 2.

Not thinking infinite enough.

Buddy seems to think this is a catch all solution instead of for incredibly specific situations.

So yeah… what else would it be about except for the details….?

You also came at me arguing details, although misguided and wrong… the irony lmfao.

Where did I say it wouldn’t? Please point it out for the rest of the class yeah?

Of course, now you need to melt the water, without boiling it since the water is contaminated, too able to pump it away for remediation. It’s a logistical nightmare.

But you realize that just because the water is frozen doesn’t mean the exothermic reaction won’t happen…. Yeah?

Edit for your edit, yeah you clearly don’t if you seriously think water freezes top down that’s not a body of water…… and ice would stop a self igniting/oxidizing exothermic reaction….

It was quite funny to hear someone think water freezes top down and use a totally unrelated situational example to try and justify it.

It will provide marginal heat for the first little while, if it’s heating up the water that much, than you need more since it’s not enough…

And says the one that thinks water freezes top down, I don’t think we will be listening to your opinion here, thanks. You can’t even understand basic physics and you want to argue the finer points, this is a new one lmfao.

That entirely on the temperature outside and cannot be answered, you should know this lmfao….

And you’re supposed to leave it submerged for 7-14 days. How long do you think water will stay warm before freezing……?

Water freezes from all sides… who told you that?

Rivers freeze from the top since the ground heats the bottom and sides….

That’s not even similar to what the announcement was.

Ah yes of course, my apologies for the misunderstanding. I hate when a butt plug is the voice of reason, thank you for your service though.

I thought the official announcement from the pentagon was it never sent any data?

Ya’ll never heard of a paralyzer drink before?

but that turns to gas as soon as it’s released into ambient pressures/temperatures

Which is what causes it to cool stuff.