Not to mention the tracking (ok, you mentioned cookie notices, but not the actual tracking) that will ultimately impact your social media feeds.

“Huh, my friend-across-the-aisle just posted something that contradicts my world view, but I’m not sure I trust that site. If I click on it, will my feed suddenly be flooded with more untrustworthy sources?”

It’s usually not worth the risk.

The 3rd party N64 controller that your friend has to use.

We’re old nerds.

Everyone I date, next person they date they marry

… Is that you, Chuck?

The ladies will be so impressed with just how much 8 is equal to D!

When I went to college, I remember hearing “Don’t Stop Believin’”, and thinking that it sounded really familiar.

Eventually, I remembered that I had played a lot of the Atari game “Journey Escape” when I was younger, and that wasn’t just a weird name for a game. 🤯

I always like to think of that as Hübsch Räuber.

Have Germans given up “Fernseher” in favor of “Television”?

free software

To make a common clarification: free as in “free speech”, not (necessarily) free as in “free beer”.

Just because the software costs nothing, doesn’t mean that it’s not hiding something. In fact, the opposite is often true.

I’m sure you know that. I’m just clarifying for OP, who isn’te a programmer.

Absolutely fair response. I’m sorry that I came across as attacking your point. I just meant to provide another reason why the cameras shouldn’t be recommended, using the context of your quote from the article. I’m sorry that I wasn’t clear about that.

That’s great, right up until Ring unilaterally decides to give the police access to your videos without a warrant, or when the police use a warrant to grab video from ALL of your cameras, even if you’ve already complied with their request, and the video is not relevant to their investigation.

The batphone, obviously.