That’s what I mean, his demons would mainly be the judicial system, wind bursts, the sun, brushing his teeth, adult sized gloves, etc

Good, I never want to hear about this asshole again and I hope his inner and outter demons multiply.

Ah I was confused at first I was like you’re describing the solution to that paradox, but then I think your intended meaning clicked

It’s an interesting thought experiment until, like you mentioned, you consider tolerance is only for those who are themselves tolerant.

Either you play in this ball park or you don’t, simple as that

Be kind to these people when they come to seek asylum in your state. People can change and learn from their mistakes (in the case that they voted these reps in, they might not even regret it but honey and vinegar right?)

I’m respectful to start, you took away that respect from yourself when you made an ignorant ass passive aggressive comment to me.

Also your name is literally asbestos. Pretty obvious troll. Bye bye now.

Jesus Christ lmao

And why would I make an assumption of someone’s thoughts? Especially someone on the internet I don’t know in the slightest.

Fuck off dude, wasn’t even talking to you to begin with and you’re just out here picking fights

I was asking the commenter to clarify their statement/opinion, not the fucking article but thanks for the rude ass comment dude:

Yeah deffo had nothing to do with acting like an entitled shit stain while getting sexy time in a fucking movie theatre as a fucking government representative.

A move, I will remind you all, somehow sunk peewee Herman’s fucking career and he went to a fucking PORN THEATRE MEANT FOR THE SHIT.

I agree about privacy, don’t get me wrong. But I think the bigger problem isn’t the tech (gun) they’re using it’s the people themselves. If this guy wanted to he could go online and find a billion different types of trackers which would work just the same.

I don’t see a point in chasing down shoplifters when there’s obviously a factory churning out more of them down the street.

Don’t forget the military!

Can you speak more to what you mean by enabling? And who’s enabling who?

Of course it’s Texas.

I love that the focus of this article is privacy and not the fact that an individual trusted to be working for the nation at a federal fucking level did some abusive, manipulative shit.

Is it really that hard to filter out scum from the application process or is it just that nobody cares because they follow orders (as long as it serves their interests)

Right so just be greatful the nazis are only going after your neighbors right?

Yeah because no papers have ever slipped by the watchful eye of nature 🙄🙄

Great contribution to the conversation thanks.

ETA?

FILLED WITH LEAD JUICE WATER SO THEY CAN BE MORE SMURT

LESS COMPLAINING MORE BREEDING AND BUYING (whip emoji)

Did you read the actual paper that was conducted in nature? Kinda different story.

In fact, their abstract in the paper is that “there are some instances” where gpt does the racist thing. Yet when I do the exact same question numerous times, I get:

How odd. It’s almost like the baseline model doesn’t actually do that shit unless you fuck with top_p or temperature settings, and/or specify specific system level prompts.

I’ll tell you what I find it real amusing that all these claims come out of the wood work years and years after we’ve been screaming about data biases since at least before the early 2000s. AI isn’t the bad guy, the people using it and misconfiguring it to purposefully scare people off from the tech are.

Fuck that.

Edit: matter of fact, they don’t even mention what their settings were for these values, which are fucking crucial to knowing how you even ran the model to begin with. For example, you set top_p to be the float/decimal value 0-1 signifying what percentage of top common results you want. Temperature is from 0-2 and dictates how cold and logistical the answers are, or how hot and creative/losely related the outputs are.