You’re totally, technically correct and I apologise :)
Reading this back it seems I’ve had a kneejerk reaction to seeing the word “AI” slapped onto a basic chatbot. I appreciate that yes, by all metrics it’s an AI - yet it draws a parallel between this kind of Hello-World chat-bot and the current state of AI, which I felt is misleading. Like comparing a canoe to a cruise ship, you know?
Streaming usage per person is available via one of the stats plugins, but it is admittedly crude and missing some info (such as bandwidth used).
I’m using the android app without issues, which didn’t require side loading, but my experience with other platforms is zero.
This seems like the cost of a game that they are unable to charge op for. Do you feel like they are not entitled to the money owed?
They could have just removed the game from the account, at least this way op is alerted of the issue and given a chance to correct it without an interruption to his entertainment.
Im not attempting to “gatekeep” anything. I’m pointing out that drawing a parallel between a keyword-based chat it script and a full LLM is disingenuous.
I did click your link. The accepted answer there states:
"The term artificial intelligence denotes behavior of a machine which, if a human behaves in the same way, is considered intelligent.
Again, I don’t think that selecting basic responses based on keywords found in the string meets the criteria for being qualified as an AI, as anyone with experience of a chat bot this simple knows it won’t hold up the illusion of “intelligence” for very long.
I did mean “equate”, you’re correct. The rest of my point remains - a very simple chat-bot like this is leaps and bounds from what would be termed an AI these days. To equate the two is misleading.
Selecting a canned-text response based on simple keywords is a long way from AI, and it’s foolish to equivocate equate the two of them.
Also, chill tf out, and don’t be so aggressively presumptious. I have enough experience with the topics in question to point out how misleading this statement is.
A bunch of IF statements don’t qualify as an AI. That’s not how that works.
Effort!
I don’t usually want to contribute my own opinion. I just want to read other people’s and silently judge them if they disagree with me.
The worst part is anyone thinking this bullshit is remotely plausible.
But I need my cuda :(
This is why I use Linux, the fingerprint device wouldn’t be supported so this wouldn’t be an issue /s
Try Deep Rock Galactic! It is neither a full time job or a money sink. Any purchases are purely cosmetic, seasons are entirely free and there are regular updates.
We don’t want muffins, no toast, buns, baps, bagets or bagels, no croissants, no crumpets, no teacakes, no potato cakes and no hot cross buns! And definitely no smegging flapjacks!
Only if you’re less than 7 inches across in the direction you’re teleporting. This is only useful for the super-skinny, otherwise you’re going to splinch yourself into a wall.
You can make a toaster do anything a toaster can do. It can’t clean your house or fly, because it’s a toaster.
Oh no! Anyway…
Edit: checked the IP of my seedbox and about 75% of the entries listed aren’t valid. Weird.
I love Jellyfin, but they need to sort their subtitle support out.
You can in fact insure things that it is possible to steal. Cars, bikes, household posessions, you name it. It’s quite common.