This title almost sounds like a setup for a joke or something.
This title almost sounds like a setup for a joke or something.
That said, while they probably want to be able to paint him as a terrorist, that necessarily involves a more detailed look at what he was trying to accomplish, and that might just backfire on the prosecution. It only takes one sympathetic juror to block a guilty verdict.
This is a really good insight, thanks!
This one is fake. The (supposedly) real one has now been published by Ken Klippenstein, and is linked in another comment on this thread.
If you trust them after having enforced an unwritten policy and still not allowing discussion of something that’s perfectly legal.
It seems that it was never written in their terms before and had been inconsistently applied, but just in case you hadn’t seen these:
Careful, in case you haven’t heard, discussing jury nullification is apparently against the rules of lemmy.world. SMH (at lemmy.world admins).
Thanks, this sounds like the most accurate and precise answer to the question.