• 30 Posts
  • 158 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2020

help-circle







  • I’ve noticed this quite a bit among people I talk to and honestly just doesn’t help move the conversation anywhere meaningful.

    What do you expect? If you have a way to improve the fediverse then just start a project or at least make a suggestion (although i doubt that’s helpful).

    Having something like an open source version of good judgement open might make things more interesting, at least it will be possible to detect “superforcaster” and direct people attention to them.



  • wiki_me@lemmy.mltoLemmy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    Obligatory mention of Linus law of trail and error:

    “Don’t ever make the mistake [of thinking] that you can design something better than what you get from ruthless massively parallel trial-and-error with a feedback cycle. That’s giving your intelligence much too much credit.”

    Create a instance and lets see what happens.

    Overall i think allowing donation is a good idea, supporting independent creators is good because big companies tend to go after the Lowest common denominator.

    There is also mitra.


  • There is a fair bit of research on what makes people good at predicting, see the good judgement project, in particular there is this article:

    Participants were above average in intelligence and political knowledge relative to the general population. Individual differences in performance emerged, and forecasting skills were surprisingly consistent over time. Key predictors were (a) dispositional variables of cognitive ability, political knowledge, and open-mindedness; (b) situational variables of training in probabilistic reasoning and participation in collaborative teams that shared information and discussed rationales (Mellers, Ungar, et al., 2014); and © behavioral variables of deliberation time and frequency of belief updating. We developed a profile of the best forecasters; they were better at inductive reasoning, pattern detection, cognitive flexibility, and open-mindedness. They had greater understanding of geopolitics, training in probabilistic reasoning, and opportunities to succeed in cognitively enriched team environments. Last but not least, they viewed forecasting as a skill that required deliberate practice, sustained effort, and constant monitoring of current affairs.

    TL;DR: speculating is fun but you should also look at the facts

    I don’t think proprietary social media is going to collapse , mark zuckerberg got a perfact SAT score, Thinking he won’t notice his platform will degrade in quality is IMO wishful thinking.








  • wiki_me@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlWhat is wayland?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    On top of what other said, the wayland project also maintains the wayland protocols repository which includes additional protocols that are approved by a “committee” that includes representatives from wayland protocol implementations (wlroots, kde , gnome , smithay etc). for example now they are working on color management.

    There appears to be a consensus among people working on window manager implementations that X has to go and wayland is the future.

    Wayland has technical benefits, if you want the nitty gritty details see this.

    Basically X11 is bad IPC at this point.

    Also be careful with what you read online, I see misinformation about it relatively often.


  • wiki_me@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlIs Ubuntu deserving the hate?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s pitched as a open source operation system, yet the snap store is closed source and vendor locked, one of the reasons some of us use Liniux is because we prefer open source (and there are rational justifications for that).

    Hate is a strong word, but there is legitimate criticism, I also think the closed source nature of snap led to the fact that it has no volunteers and that eventually caused malware to appear on the snap store multiple time, it never happened on flathub as far as i know.

    Today for beginner i think opensuse and linux mint are better.

    Regarding debian having old packages , i use nix but it is fairly immature, flathub should also work.







  • That said, Torvalds continued, “Rust has not really shown itself as the next great big thing. But I think during next year, we’ll actually be starting to integrate drivers and some even major subsystems that are starting to use it actively. So it’s one of those things that is going to take years before it’s a big part of the kernel. But it’s certainly shaping up to be one of those.”

    I don’t know about that, languages which are based on standards (c++ , javascript, c) seem to have much better enduring popularity, i don’t want to see rust becoming less and less popular which will lead to less available developers (like what is happening with ruby).



  • This shouldn’t really make any difference. In lemmy it would appear as a normal reply notification once per thread.

    Still an annoyance, i post on reddit and lemmy for years, to keep having to delete that reply for years to come could accumulate to a significant amount of time, and small segments of time wasted tend to add up

    I’ll see if I can expand the bot, but I don’t want each reply to end up like a wall of text.

    You could add the “about this bot” the line above it ( making a two lines message) but this could be cryptic and therefore off putting for new lemmy users (creating a bad impression of the platform).

    That would defeat the purpose, as the discovery from mastodon would happen days/weeks/months after that thread was active.

    When you reply the person you reply to still get notifications , lemmy “active” sort bumps posts when they get new comments (see docs) and anyway most of the time i assume people just read comments and don’t respond, and the idea is to make lemmy more discoverable so after that they could visit lemmy and participate more actively.



  • That might be useful if someone will want to learn if a particular project is not really open source, and raise awareness to the issue of open washing, if it will get enough links it might appear on search results raising even more awareness to the issue.

    You could always start it, ask for positive feed back saying it will motivate you and validate that the efforts you are doing are useful, you could later abandon it and someone else might take it and continue to maintaining it.


  • Repeatedly getting tagged by this bot sounds like it is a PITA.

    Having a command you can send with a private message so it won’t tag you could be useful , something like :

    dontTagMe: @wiki_me@lemmy.ml .

    It’s also pretty confusing if you encounter a post the first time, having it write something like :

    new lemmy post: ‘Moving media library to bigger HDD’ on community #Selfhosted by @rambos

    (Replying in this thread will appear as a comment in the lemmy discussion.)

    about this bot (link to a explanation)

    Could be more understandable.

    Regarding you saying on the read me you are not a rust developer A tutorial on youtube implies you can learn the basics in aboutt 3h, since your contribution gets reviewed by experienced developer that should be enough and you can learn more things on the fly (Assuming there are more things you want to contribute to on lemmy).

    having a command where the moderators of a community can tweak the frequency of posting (or maybe even posting just the top post for day/week/month etc) could also be helpful