And this is an argument to fundamentally sacrifice the good on the altar of the perfect. Would it be better that minority positions, accomplishments, and experiences were taught as part of broader curriculums? Of course–but they’re not. Doing away with Black History Month doesn’t address that, because the alternative isn’t a broader solution, but to simply do nothing. BHM is a bandaid, but if you rip off the bandaid, it’s still a wound. With the bandaid there at least we’re forced to acknowledge the wound.
Similarly, giving away cash in the form of loan forgiveness doesn’t solve the problem of greed in upper education, but it does alleviate pain felt by an entire generation of working Americans. This is a perfect example of the problem: the fascists blocked the relief, and then what happened? Did we muscle down as a society and get to work on the difficult problems of moving higher education away from the current profit-motivated model? No, of course not. What happened instead? Right: Nothing happened. Tuition is still reprehensibly high. The only difference is that the last generation of borrowers continue to suffer, just like the next will.
The point is, BHM is not an alternative to systemic policy changes to address historic racism and other discrimination: it’s a stopgap, and lobbying for its abandonment isn’t lobbying for a societal pivot to more effective ways to address the problem. It’s lobbying that black history not be taught at all.
It would be very, very bad. A Haley presidency is less outright catastrophic than Trump II, but it carries its own set of terrible knock-on effects, chiefest being what it means downballot. If Haley wins the White House, it potentially also means the GOP also won Congress by non-nominal margins:
For Haley to win in a hypothetical match-up against Biden today, she’d potentially represent a 2 to 4 point better performance than Trump in the same hypothetical match-up (or more). That is, the GOP performs at least 2 points better in the Presidential election today if Haley is the candidate. That’s going to ripple down to close House and Senate contests. Haley is a scary nominee because she can actually flip voters, something that neither Trump nor DeSantis can do (spoiler candidates notwithstanding). Partisanship is high, and people who vote Haley because they view it as a return to GOP normalcy are likely to also vote for other Republicans on the ballot–even psychotic MAGA Republicans, because voters tend to be uninformed.
All of that is to say that while a Haley presidency might not be disastrous in isolation, it wouldn’t be in isolation. It would be in the context of potentially complete GOP control of the federal government. That’s a nightmare scenario for the future of the Republic and democracy in general.
So if your state has open primaries, vote for DeSantis in your local GOP primary, and vote for Biden in the general.