• CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember reading 538 leading up to the 2016 election, and hearing them say repeatedly that if Trump has a 1 in 4 chance (or whatever amount) of winning the election, not only is it possible for Trump to win, but in fact it means you actually expect it to happen in 1 out of 4 times.

    • Asifall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I remember this too. I think the problem is that people simply don’t understand statistics and don’t realize a 70% chance of winning is totally different from getting 70% of the vote. I like what 538 has been doing in recent years by presenting odds rather than percentages, but people like echo chambers that confirm their biases so idk if this “polls don’t work” narrative is going to go away any time soon.

    • Auntie Oedipus ✊🏰🕰️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the article that has caused me to trust 538 above any other election prediction source. When HRC was doing a preemptive victory lap in Texas and HuffPo was publishing articles that said she had a 99% chance of winning, Nate Silver and Co were the only ones willing to admit the possibility of what would later become reality.