Sören@iusearchlinux.fyi to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoHow it feels likeiusearchlinux.fyiimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1346arrow-down124
arrow-up1322arrow-down1imageHow it feels likeiusearchlinux.fyiSören@iusearchlinux.fyi to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squarejana@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoJSX can exist without React; it’s essentially just an alternative syntax for function calls. (That is, annoyingly, handicapped in the Typescript checker)
minus-squareSleepless One@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoSolid uses JSX and is both much more performant than React while removing several of it’s footguns. You also have WASM frameworks like Leptos that use similar syntax (RSX) while using languages that aren’t JS.
minus-squarenaught@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoVery true! Shouldnt be a point for react i guess. I believe they originated the syntax perhaps? Regardless, I love it (:
JSX can exist without React; it’s essentially just an alternative syntax for function calls.
(That is, annoyingly, handicapped in the Typescript checker)
Solid uses JSX and is both much more performant than React while removing several of it’s footguns. You also have WASM frameworks like Leptos that use similar syntax (RSX) while using languages that aren’t JS.
Very true! Shouldnt be a point for react i guess. I believe they originated the syntax perhaps? Regardless, I love it (: