Google pays Apple $18B to $20B a year to keep its search in iPhone::Bernstein estimates value of agreement, warns it and similar deals may end if DoJ wins antitrust case

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not surprising, Google created Android precisely because they were afraid of losing the “default search” spot on mobile. The Play Store, Play Services, tracking your location, those motivators came later. They quite openly stated this already. They saw the success of the iPhone and quickly adapted their mobile OS to also support touch, and the reason these mobile projects even existed was to try and stop Microsoft to succeed in mobile and therefore remove Google from the default search fields.

    • Xylight@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google created Android

      I thought they bought it. Was it some ex google engineer that made it or something?

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as I know, they bought the system with the goal of running it on mobile digital cameras and other consumer electronics (like music players).

        But when they saw the iPhone, the effort to convert this system into what we now see as Android was internal and made by Google.

        But I could’ve been fed wrong information though.

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is a lot of money for a search engine that barely works.

      • cjsolx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But that’s how it’s supposed to work, so it’s working just fine? Amazing, actually.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what they need to pay to get people to use it.

      When Google was released in the 90’s they didn’t have to pay anyone, everyone wanted to use it.

    • raptir@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It would definitely require a substantial effort for Mozilla to find other funding. If I were Mozilla right now I would be trying to secure other deals to act as a safety net if this ruling goes through.

      That said, with Firefox being open source apart from the branding another group could pick up development if Mozilla were to somehow go under. One of the popular “spins” of Firefox could become the predominant version and could see further browser development there.

      • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It basically already has killed Firefox for normies, though. It’s just taking a long time to die. Have a look at their market share over the last decade. Hopefully enough people keep using it that it stays actively developed, but that’s hardly guaranteed.

        • raptir@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It only needs enough users that Google keeps paying enough to be the default search engine.

  • Tick Dracy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even though I use iOS devices, Google isn’t my search engine on these devices. I can understand an organization like Mozilla needing the money from Google, but when we’re talking about a trillion dollar company, I cannot have the same understanding.

    • ours@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like corporations would pass on literally tens of billions of dollars (yearly) just because they are big.

      Unless Apple had it’s own competing search service they have no reason to pass on that much money unless it becomes a huge liability.

      • Tick Dracy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess you’re right. And maybe most is their users are fine (or prefer) to use Google search, so that’s even a plus for Apple.