• Auntie Oedipus ✊🏰🕰️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Political theater from the Dems, though I’ll admit it would be fun when scotus sues to stop the law then is the plaintiff on a case before itself where it gets to rule as to whether the exceptions clause is in that part of the constitution that is absolutely the law of the land or in that part of the constitution that is inconvenient and to be ignored

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The conversation has to start. US health care isn’t there, but it has advanced in my lifetime because the conversation started with bills like this being introduced against odds. Acknowledge that.

    • English Mobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

      Congress has the power to do whatever to the Supreme Court. It’s explicit, unlike the power to declare something unconstitutional. Congress is the check on SCOTUS.