The law ( the Leahy Law) requires that the US vet any foreign military receiving US arms. However, that doesn’t happen with Israel

    • Toldry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can credibldy argue that Israel has an outsized influence of US foreign policy, but to call the US an “Israeli puppet state” is such a hyperbolic exaggeration that it sounds less like a valid criticism and more like the old “Jews control the world” antisemitic hate speech.

      The US has far more influence on Israel than vice versa

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Its hard to tell sometimes whether somebody is using phrasing like that naively or as a dog whistle (which is why its an effective dog whistle). The reality is Israel plays a critical role in maintaining US empire and public image and Netanyahu is cashing in those in for a racist child-killing spree.

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. The USA is simply too powerful to ever become anyone’s lapdog, they’re a force unto themselves

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s not commit to hyperbole. Netty is just a manipulative ass who needs Israel distracted with another war

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        fucking oppressed palestinian people, how dare they resist genocide, right?

        There is no genocide of Palestinians. Less than 1% of Palestinians have been killed in this conflict

        • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

          a. Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

          b. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

          c. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

          d. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

          I’m not totally convinced that this is Israel’s intent—most of what I’ve seen points to a brazen and sociopathic indifference typical of 7th graders and goofy “strongman” populists like Netanyahu alike—but the percentage of the population killed does not factor in determining whether it is genocide.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They’ve killed 0.6% of the population, counting enemy militants.

            Gaza is 5x the density of Mosul, in which the US (who quite obviously was not committing genocide) killed ~10,000 civilians.

            Things can be shitty and not be genocide.

            • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Again, I really don’t to weigh in on whether or not it is genocide, if only because I’m not gonna change anybody’s opinion here. Alls I’m saying is that the qualifications for genocide do not include the destruction of the entire, or even the majority of, the population.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Any sane look at the situation makes it obvious it is not genocide

                • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And I’m still not trying to argue with you on that. I’m just saying that the numbers you’re citing do not support your case. There are most definitely situations where killing 0.6% of a population would be considered genocide.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Maybe, if they fit any of the other criteria, which Israel obviously does not

                • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Raz Segal is an associate professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Stockton University and the endowed professor in the study of modern genocide.

                  TIL A Jewish professor of Holocaust and genocide studies is insane.