• kattenluik@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s completely wrong, for the ISPs it usually isn’t worth achieving and is why the government should step in.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      for the ISPs it usually isn’t worth achieving

      Yes that’s exactly my point

      and is why the government should step in.

      Okay but…they don’t.

      Starlink also covers the entire planet and all the oceans, which is simply not feasible with wires.

      • kattenluik@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And also simply not necessary to have as many satellites as Starlink does needed to cover the ocean and the rare spots where wires can’t go.

      • gaael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        And we really need that 4K UHD porn to load faster on the hole planet, including the oceans.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re intentionally conflating high speed internet access with any internet access at all.