“The steam loom is going to put weavers out of work, industrialization is a double edged sword and needs to be carefully considered”.
This is the same complaint made about literally every single AI programme. It’s not necessarily invalid, but if Mozilla doesn’t move into this space plenty of other competitors still will.
Why do you keep deleting your messages and re-replying with essentially the same thing?
I’ll repost my reply to your last deleted message:
As someone who has never had any particular compunction about sailing the digital seven seas, and generally has a liberal view of copyright laws and overly comprehensive intellectual property protections, I really don’t give a hoot about whether publicly accessible websites have been used as training data for a website creating system.
If you don’t want people/machines to read your intellectual property, don’t post it on the internet.
As someone who has never had any particular compunction about sailing the digital seven seas, and generally has a liberal view of copyright laws and overly comprehensive intellectual property protections, I really don’t give a hoot about whether publicly accessible websites have been used as training data for a website creating system.
If you don’t want people/machines to read your intellectual property, don’t post it on the internet.
deleted
Those are stupid and I doubt any web developer wrote these. Unless they were also scared about WYSIWYG editors 25+ years ago.
deleted
You don’t have to spam me by deleting and lazily reposting your comment.
Edit: And a third time. Reported.
deleted
deleted
I guess even web developers can be stupid. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
deleted
Not to be finicky, but neither of these necessarily indicate “development” experience.
deleted
Well sure, but there are a lot of sorts “tech people” and their expertise don’t necessarily overlap with every tech issue.
“The steam loom is going to put weavers out of work, industrialization is a double edged sword and needs to be carefully considered”.
This is the same complaint made about literally every single AI programme. It’s not necessarily invalid, but if Mozilla doesn’t move into this space plenty of other competitors still will.
Mozilla is allowed to do more than one thing.
deleted
Why do you keep deleting your messages and re-replying with essentially the same thing?
I’ll repost my reply to your last deleted message:
As someone who has never had any particular compunction about sailing the digital seven seas, and generally has a liberal view of copyright laws and overly comprehensive intellectual property protections, I really don’t give a hoot about whether publicly accessible websites have been used as training data for a website creating system.
If you don’t want people/machines to read your intellectual property, don’t post it on the internet.
deleted
Step back, take a breath, and focus your beliefs into more succinct and tactful displays. And lose the passive aggressive judgment rhetoric.
deleted
As someone who has never had any particular compunction about sailing the digital seven seas, and generally has a liberal view of copyright laws and overly comprehensive intellectual property protections, I really don’t give a hoot about whether publicly accessible websites have been used as training data for a website creating system.
If you don’t want people/machines to read your intellectual property, don’t post it on the internet.
deleted
deleted