President Joe Biden hosted a small group of scholars and historians for lunch on Wednesday as he gears up for a speech framing the upcoming election as a battle for the nation’s democracy.

The discussion revolved around “ongoing threats to democracy and democratic institutions both here in America and around the world, as well as the opportunities we face as a nation,” the White House said in a statement.

Princeton’s Eddie Glaude Jr. and Sean Wilentz, Harvard’s Annette Gordon-Reed, Yale’s Beverly Gage and Boston College’s Heather Cox Richardson were among the attendees, as well as presidential biographer — and occasional Biden speech writer — Jon Meacham.

Attendees were tight-lipped about what was discussed at the gathering. One would only go so far as to say they “talked about American history and its bearing on the present — a lively exchange of ideas.”

Another person in the room, who like the others was not authorized to speak publicly about a private meeting, said the historians urged the president “to call out the moment for what it is.” In blunt terms, the academics discussed looming threats to the nation’s democracy and warned about the slow crawl of authoritarianism around the globe.

  • Soulg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Trump is the bigger threat. Once he’s gone that should become the new focus

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      There will always be another bigger threat, the fash voter base, police and military presence, and judicial presence doesn’t go away when Trump does. Biden needed to clean house, not tiptoe and allow these people to sit on the sidelines like Clarence Thomas until they activate like a sleeper cel.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not likely. Alternative voting is a threat to both the RNC and DNC hegemony.

      Libertarian and Green candidates are routinely decried as ‘false flag vote siphons’ despite having materially different policy stances from both main parties. It’s easier to keep your team in line with national level funding and intra-party discipline than to actually compromise and work on bi/tri-partisan legislation or a coalition government.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        people should concentrate third party at local levels as there is a real chance there also vetting the candidates at the primary level. We have greens at various local positions around me but we have also had insincere candidates try and run as the party canidate (they think getting on a third party will be easier)