and because i’m a lazy ass i didn’t read the specs but just read the search engine result.

I also assumed that because 6 years ago i bought a $50 hp envy and it had wifi, this much expensive one is also going to have it

Result: that $250 printer doesn’t actually have wifi

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, that’s the rip off right there, 250$ for a printer and it’s not a Brother? Fuck no.

    • .Donuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      While this is perfect for documents and prints where picture quality doesn’t matter, OP mentioned later that they bought it specifically for photos.

      You can use laser for photos but it looks like shit, so inkjet was the right way to go here

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Only cheap laser looks like shit for images.

        Also, using the right paper is crucial.

        • .Donuts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Paper is everything, yes. But you can’t beat the image quality of inkjet when it comes to photos. Acceptable images, sure. But printing photos to sell or frame? No way.