If you ever wanted to read about fake druids vs. environmental activists, now’s your chance.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Those stones will be suuuper useful to us after we died because our global ecosystem collapsed.

    Maybe we should set up our own stones for explaining to future generations why we didnt do anything about climate change until it was too late.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m not sure how this helps though. These people can say to future generations, “well, we didn’t get people to stop using fossil fuels, but we did damage a 5000-year-old monument that was made long before anyone had the idea of burning fossil fuels to make people aware of a problem they were already aware of but powerless to do anything about.”

      This isn’t going to stop oil companies from drilling for oil.

      It reminds me of a friend of mine I used to follow elsewhere on social media. Every day, she would post pictures of ‘death row dogs’ in nearby shelters that were going to be euthanized. There was fuck all I could do about it. I already have two dogs, from shelters. I don’t have room for more and I couldn’t afford more. So all it did was make me feel like shit. Then she started posting photos with “too late” messages and I stopped following her.

      How does that help?

      • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Many of the recent protests about climate change have been less direct and more about stirring up controversy to force the public to actually think about their decisions.

        My hat off to them as so far this style of protest has been working and has resulted in many of us pushing for better climate control.

        You’re right this isn’t going to stop companies, but even if you disagreed with them it puts climate change in your conscious mind. Even if that simply means you’ll try to make slightly more climate friendly decisions moving forwards, that’s a win.

        Personally I don’t know if I agree with the technique, but I do feel like it has been working in terms of making people discuss this topic more.

      • 555@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Normally I would say this damage was inappropriate. But, considering humanity is going to be eradicated in the next hundred years, give or take, I think maybe we should be doing more to slow that down.

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          FWIW this kind of alarmist talk only lets people write off your comment as hysterical. Humans are not going to go extinct in the next 100 years, Canada isnt going to become hotter than Arabia and become unlivable.

          What we might (and even possibly the most likely scenario is to) get is wide scale societal breakdown, starvation of billions, mass migration of billions of those currently living in regions that become uninhabitable but dont starve, and the consequant resource wars that those entail. The future is bleak enough without making up even worse things that wont happen.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          But we’re not talking about it. We’re not talking about political action, or technological solutions, or mitigation programs, or investments in adaptation, or natural resource management, or harm reduction, or food distribution, or drought management.

          No, we’re talking about a bunch of first world children who decided to paint a bunch of ten-thousand year old rocks for attention.