• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There is no way to feed all the people without factory farming. Reduce the population, or deal with the demand.

    Sit with that.

        • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Which part are you dubious about?

          Not enough land for meat? There is technically… but it requires factory farms and STILL we need to chop down huge swaths of the amazon to keep the machine churning.

          Not enough land for plant based diets? Is takes only about 1/10th the amount of land to grow plants for human consumption than to grow plants for feeding our animals that we then consume. Sure not every alfalfa farm on the planet can switch to cucumbers out the gate, but well over 10% can…

            • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 minutes ago

              Why? Every step you move up the food chain requires roughly 10x as much inputs as outputs. To get a pound of protein from a cow you have to feed it 10lbs of plant protein. Almost all cattle feed comes from farms, just like your veggies. Anywhere we grow soybeans and hay for cattle could easily be converted to growing fruits and vegetables for human consumption. There’s a small loss of efficiency by growing human-quality food instead of cattle food in these spaces, but its nothing in comparison to the loss of resources from trying to raise cattle.

              Almost none of the meat we eat is truly free-range - it all gets fed farmed produce that comes from farms that could grow food for humans in a fraction of the space.