Summary

Former Ukrainian boxing champion Wladimir Klitschko accused podcaster Joe Rogan of “repeating Russian propaganda” after Rogan criticized U.S. military aid to Ukraine and suggested it could escalate into World War III.

Klitschko defended Ukraine’s resistance against Russia, highlighting the country’s fight for freedom and condemning Rogan’s remarks as aiding Putin’s agenda.

He invited Rogan to discuss their differences on the podcast “like free men.”

Rogan, who recently endorsed Donald Trump, called the war a “proxy war” and criticized Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to strike Russian soil with U.S.-supplied missiles.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Considering the last fair Ukrainian election leaned friendly towards Russia, before the US staged a coup with the far-right, I’d be willing to bet Russia would allow neurtral election monitors in.

    • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sorry, when was the last fair election in Ruzzia again?

      Who was it that backed the totalitarian ruler that was overthrown by the people of Ukraine?

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        They probably haven’t had a fair election since the Soviet Union. Just because I oppose the far right puppet government in Ukraine does not imply I support Russia.

        The people of Ukraine elected a government that was then overthrown in a coup by far-right Nazis and backed by the US.

        • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It was an organised people’s revolution last I recall. There was clear evidence of fraud working directly opposite of the will of the people. That is fact. Unless you’re saying that’s not accepted fact and can provide evidence to the contrary?

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            So the Maiden Coup didn’t happen? LoL. What evidence would convince someone who denies a historical event actually happened?

            Especially a historical event where Nazis came to power. People who deny those aren’t typically swayed by any evidence.

            • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I literally said it did happen. It was literally a people’s revolution that saw the end of a russian puppet taking power illegally and the rise of a people tired of being under the boot?

              Do I deny NATO or US involvement? No. That would be naive and counter to historical fact. It would actually almost be as naive as believing the kremlin propaganda points you spew out.

              Ukrainians tired of being sold out by their politicians changed the course of power in their nation and in return Russia invaded Crimea. This is fact. With or without US aid. This is fact. The will for change was there. This is fact. Russia openly and brazenly defrauded the Ukrainian election. This is fact.

              Prove to me that Nazis took over the entire Ukrainian government. Show me the facts.

              • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                You mean besides the people themselves saying they’re Nazis, covering their military in Nazi insignias, and naming streets after Nazis & erecting statues of them? What’s more convincing than someone covered in Nazi patches telling you openly that they are Nazis?

                The US Congress had to end their ban on arming Nazis in order to send arms to Ukraine.

                • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I don’t even know how to combat the level of cognitive dissonance going on here. I have several starting points but you’re just going to continue refuting anything I say with baseless kremlin talking points that further marginalise the Ukrainian people.

                  There are Nazis, Socialists, Anarchists, Libertarians, Agrarianists, Monarchists in almost every single country and by association their military. As it stands, the Russian military states the eradication of the ukrainian people as a primary goal of their campaign. Though they call it “denazification” it’s just a more supported term for ethnic cleansing. The Kremlin has placed Nazi ideology at the centre of Ukrainian identity thus vilifying an entire nation of people. They have created a fear of “other” amongst their people and drive to dehumanise Ukrainians as fascist dogs.

                  What this is, political tactics right out of the actual Nazi playbook. Ukraine is labelled as a fascist state by Russia because it provides Casus Belli. They have looked at a vocal minority and a troubled history then used that to justify the idea that Ukrianians need to be erased for Wrongthink.

                  I do not refute that the AZOV battalion exists, I do not refute that nazis exist within Ukraine or their armed forces. What I do refute is that Nazism, Fascism and ethnic cleansing are the stated goal of the Ukrainian people, their government or their military. Ukraine has fought for a long time to cleanse their politik and ensure a bright future for their people.

                  What I suppose is that Fascism and Ethnic Cleansing are the stated goals of the Kremlin, their military and many of their people. The idea has just been sold under a centuries long buildup of lies. The only way Russia wins this completely is by changing hearts and minds. They have time and time again proved that they will accomplish this goal by wiping out entire towns of civilians, invading sovereign land, deporting natives and importing russians, then holding referendums at gun point.

                  Each step of the way, the threads of wool the Kremlin attempts to pull over our eyes have been transparent. Clear as day to all those who take a moment to analyse further than surface level rhetoric and shit flinging.

                  In Russia’s eyes, in their supporters eyes, Russia can do no wrong so long as Ukraine is worse. So Ukraine is painted as worse. When even Chinese diplomats call for an end to Russian aggression and the cleansing of Ukraine, when even China can say Russia has defiled internationally recognised borders; you don’t have to look far to see that Russia is projecting false accusations on Ukraine to remain “Clean” at home.

                  To add on to the Nazis in culture bit: John A. Macdonald slaughtered natives, initiated residential schools, Eisenhower supported fascist ideas, Churchill slaughtered Bangladeshis through inaction. We still name places for these people. We still remember their nation building. As time goes on and we become a more inclusive society we recognise the evils of their actions and slowly phase them out of the limelight. We have peace and security. We have the time to find new heroes. New stories and new dreams.

                  When has Ukraine been afforded the liberty to come together as a nation and lay down arms? For nations as burdened as Ukraine, Palestine, Afghanistan, often times the only heroes who exist are people who have had to do horrible things to make sure their country still exists tomorrow. When the fighting is done, when the swords are sheathed we can sit around and have philosophers build nations. Until such a time as Russia leaves Ukraine alone, they do not have the liberty to name Philosophers as heroes. History is always messy and it is the job of future generations, when the wars are over, to correct record for all to see.

                  TL;DR: If Russia left Ukraine alone for 10 fucking minutes maybe they could work on correcting the internal politics of their nation that has been struggling to survive thanks to Russian aggression.