cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoOh well...lemmy.mlimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageOh well...lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-squareQueen HawlSera@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 months agoYeah, but it can’t be in direct retalliation, it must be based on work performance. Normally the former is hard to prove, but sometimes it’s obvious.
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 months agoThat’s simply not accurate in 49 out of 50 states. Basically, you can be fired for any reason aside from membership in a protected class. But if you are terminated without cause, you can collect unemployment, which the further employer is required to pay.
Yeah, but it can’t be in direct retalliation, it must be based on work performance. Normally the former is hard to prove, but sometimes it’s obvious.
That’s simply not accurate in 49 out of 50 states.
Basically, you can be fired for any reason aside from membership in a protected class.
But if you are terminated without cause, you can collect unemployment, which the further employer is required to pay.