And what is the evidence for it being a Chinese spying platform? Is it owned by a Chinese company? Is there any hard evidence? Why is it so controversial?

  • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Your link provided me with more proper information than your biased quick take, so thanks for that, I guess.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      By the way, there’s also a Wikipedia article about TikTok with a whole paragraph about privacy and security concerns. Along with references. None of it is refuted. TikTok / ByteDance themselves tell who owns the platform. And they seem to be very clear themselves in that they log your interactions, location, mobile carrier, information about your phone, your biometric face features and so on and so on.

      • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Thanks. I’m getting the sense that, while ByteDance doesn’t collect any more information than Meta or Instagram, it’s info is suspected to be accessible by the CCP, which may be used for anti-US programs/policies, etc.

        • neatchee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          This is the most accurate conclusion so far. The US government considers it a national security threat. There are lots of things it’s “okay” for your own government to do but not a foreign government :)

          • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Which makes perfect sense. I don’t think this would be a thing if ByteDance was a British or Canadian company either. The issue is it’s Chinese, and China is an enemy of the U.S. right now.

            • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              Though, the US, British or Canadian government doesn’t collect that much info on their citizens and citizens of other countries in large databases. They have laws that limit the amount of government surveillance. We can argue if they’re strict enough etc, but at least they exist. Which isn’t really the case for China. So it’s fair to treat them differently. And by the way other countries also sometimes cut down on what’s allowed to transfer to the USA in a similar way, since for example the NSA is free to collect lots of data on foreigners. And legislation is just different. But that’s been usually for other services. Cutting down on social media altogether (instead of just have them pay a hefty fine) is a relatively new thing.

              • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                13 hours ago

                It’s also fair to treat them differently on account of them not being unfriendly to the U.S. Regardless, I agree data privacy laws need to be improved across the board.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              It would be incorrect to call china an “enemy” of the US,…they are more:

              • an adversary on several topics (such as regional territories, relations with Russia on the Ukraine conflict)

              • a partner on others (such as trade)