Actually, it’s 5 4 10 12 2 9 8 11 6 7 3 1 for me, but too lazy to edit the image

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Which language provides the most random alphabetically sorted sequence?

    Data
    |  N | Eng | Dut | Ger | Tur | Chi | Lex |
    |----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
    |  1 |   8 |   8 |   8 |   6 |   8 |   1 |
    |  2 |  11 |   3 |   3 |   5 |   2 |  10 |
    |  3 |   5 |   1 |   1 |   1 |   9 |  11 |
    |  4 |   4 |  11 |  11 |   9 |   6 |  12 |
    |  5 |   9 |   9 |   5 |   4 |   3 |   2 |
    |  6 |   1 |  10 |   9 |   2 |   4 |   3 |
    |  7 |   7 |  12 |   6 |  10 |   7 |   4 |
    |  8 |   6 |   2 |   7 |  11 |  10 |   5 |
    |  9 |  10 |   4 |   4 |  12 |  12 |   6 |
    | 10 |   3 |   5 |  10 |   8 |  11 |   7 |
    | 11 |  12 |   6 |   2 |   3 |   5 |   8 |
    | 12 |   2 |   7 |  12 |   7 |   1 |   9 |
    

    Sourced from comments in thread (English from image, Dutch from !Vinny_93@lemmy.world, German from !TJA@sh.itjust.works , Turkish from some rando, Chinese from !idealotus@lemmy.world, Lexicographical from !monogram@feddit.nl)

    Plot with Correlation Scores

    We will compute the pearson correlation (r-statistic) score by comparing the base number (column 1) with the corresponding language column. We will also compute the Serial correlation, by creating staggered columns that measure how close a number is in a sequence to the one before it.

    Staggered Table
    cat alphabetic.tab \
        | awk '{print $0"\t"prE"\t"prD"\t"prG"\t"prT"\t"prC"\t"prL;prE=$2;prD=$3;prG=$4;prT=$5;prC=$6;prL=$7}' \
        | tee alphabetic.tab.stagger
    
    Plot Code
    gnuplot -p -e '
      set xlabel "Base Sequence";
      set ylabel "Alphabetic";
      set xtics 1,1,12;
      set ytics 1,1,12;
      set title "Alphabetic Number Plot with Correlation Score";
      set rmargin 25; set key at graph 1.5,0.9;
      set size ratio 0.45;
    
      stats "alphabetic.tab.stagger" using 1:2 name "E";
      stats "" using 1:3 name "D";
      stats "" using 1:4 name "G";
      stats "" using 1:5 name "T";
      stats "" using 1:6 name "C";
      stats "" using 1:7 name "L";
      
      stats "" using 2:8 name "ES";
      stats "" using 3:9 name "DS";
      stats "" using 4:10 name "GS";
      stats "" using 5:11 name "TS";
      stats "" using 6:12 name "CS";
      stats "" using 7:13 name "LS";
    
      set label 1 sprintf("%10s  %6s  %6s", "", "Base", "Stagger") at graph 1.07,0.95;
    
      plot "" using 1:2 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "English", E_correlation, ES_correlation),
           "" using 1:3 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Dutch", D_correlation, DS_correlation),
           "" using 1:4 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "German", G_correlation, GS_correlation),
           "" using 1:5 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Turkish", T_correlation, TS_correlation),
           "" using 1:6 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Chinese", C_correlation, CS_correlation),
           "" using 1:7 with lines lw 1 title sprintf("%10s  %+.3f  %+.3f", "Lexicon", L_correlation, LS_correlation)
    '
    

    It looks like Dutch has the lowest (near 0) correlation to both the base sequence and it’s own staggered sequence, with Turkish mirroring it’s staggered randomness somewhat.

    The least random alphabetic sequences are English and German.


    Updated: Added chinese and staggered analysis.

  • vrojak@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I recently found out that javascript’s .sort() function, when called without arguments on an array of numbers, converts them all to strings and sorts them alphabetically 🤡

    • ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m a C programmer. My first time writing Javascript and ran into some sort of bug involving a === sign or something. Javascript is a silly language.

        • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          The epitomy of irony is a JavaScript developer insisting that some other language is “a fractal of bad design” without immediately acknowledging that JS is weird as hell.

      • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Javascript lets you compare unlike types without extra steps using ==. If you want strict comparison where “2” isn’t 2, use === and !==. Personally, I find that easier than having to parseint or cast every damn thing or whatever c does (strtol?). That said, I have build tools set up to enforce strict comparison because I don’t trust myself or others.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Truish and falsish and nullish are all concepts made up by madmen. JavaScript is the language of the damned.

  • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Portuguese

    cinco, dez, dois, doze, nove, oito, onze, quatro, seis, sete, três, um

    5 10 2 12 9 8 11 4 6 7 3 1

    cinco, dez, dois, doze, meia, nove, oito, onze, quatro, sete, três, um

    5 10 2 12 6 9 8 11 4 7 3 1

    (six can be “seis” or “meia”)

    • Die Martin Die@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Mine is Spanish

      Cinco (5), cuatro (4), diez (10), doce (12), dos (2), nueve (9), ocho (8), once (11), seis (6), siete (7), tres (3), una (1)

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    If a mechanical clock or watch was like that it would be one hell of a fascinating movement

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sure but the clock doesn’t tell time any differently—now it’s just displaying wrong, instead.

  • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 days ago

    Acht, drie, een, elf, negen, tien, twaalf, twee, vier, vijf, zes, zeven.

    8, 3, 1, 11, 9, 10, 12, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7