• Rilichu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The GOP gladly let their party turn into a cult and very few cults manage to live on after its leader is dead/no longer viable.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was probably worth it to them since they locked the Supreme Court for a generation at least.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they lose everything after, the court has little power. They can just change the laws. As it stands, the court has lots of power as they struggle to change laws with house and presidency changing back and forth.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A true rival conservative party, one not devoted to religion, could break through if one existed. I do think the shift is actually left and progressives will form the next second party and the Democratic Party will be the moderate / right party in the future.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, there’s room for something like the republicans were as the Whigs collapsed to rise, but if not there will likely be a democratic splinter into something like a labor/progressive party.

        • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think Gen Z would like that, but it will be a tough road. The GOP looks to die with Boomers and it won’t be replaced. Libratarians might get MAGA, but it will continue to be a third party.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a person who would be on the increasingly-poorly-defined “right” in this instance, that sounds dope AF.

        • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been planted in the center for a long time, but an anti business left is growing. I personally don’t see long term success, I do see young support for breaking things up.

    • davi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      they’ve been ready for him; that’s why most republicans very publicly kiss his ass; all in the hopes that they don’t draw ire when he is inevitably made ineligible to run.

      • davi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        these engagements always go the same way, so here’s a copy/paste from somewhere else:

        since you’re clearly digging in your heels; i’m going to try to undercut your next arguments since they are always the same three from the deeply ignorant liberal crowd:

        • biden recently defended his decisions on all three plus multiple more shitty decisions; so it doesn’t matter how long ago he said it or made those laws.
        • biden refused to change his mind all the way up until his presidential campaign and has a solid history of changing his mind but only once it becomes politically convenient for him; so he didn’t “evolve” or get better, he just knows that trump is weaker on this topic and uses your ignorance about his past of truly horrific anti-lgbtq/black/poor history to get your vote.

        Additionally: no, dunking on gays for easy politically points in the past wasn’t popular, many politicians (eg bernie sanders) never did it.

        • his beliefs are the reason why he’s not bothering to improve anything, especially on the student loan debt. also: yes there are many things he can do even though congress is trying to block him; but he won’t do it no matter what. (google these too)
  • Zombiepirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “For Republicans, the only hope is that when Trump is on the ballot in 2024 … he will turn out rural voters at a rate that overwhelms that phenomenon. It’s certainly possible,” the source said.

    Isn’t it funny that the only “hope” for Republicans is to re-install a vile, amoral, nepotistic, habitually-lying, tax-cheating, proudly-ignorant, racist, fascist, rapist con-man who tried to overthrow the government?

    Wait, not “funny,” the other one…

    Stupid.

    • ExiledElf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      “If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed … and we will deserve it.” - Lindsey Graham

      • KuchiKopi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve successfully repressed many of my Trump-era political memories.

        Can anyone tell me how Republicans went from “we’ll be destroyed and we’ll deserve it” to “unggh, Daddy Trump, destroy me harder” between 2016 and 2017?

        • wile_e8@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because the Trump cult got emboldened after Trump won in 2016, and it quickly became clear that any Republican that wasn’t sufficiently “unggh, Daddy Trump, destroy me harder” would get primaried by someone that was. Kiss the ring or be excommunicated.

          It’s hard to feel sympathetic for them about it though, the spent the previous 20+ years paying lip service to types of people who make up the Trump cult because they were convenient for winning elections. They just never expected those people would do anything besides vote in the most respectable business-friendly Republican. Leopards, faces, yadda yadda yadda.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          He was winning. Once he was the nominee the establishment republicans all got behind him because otherwise they ran the risk of being primaried

  • Gameboy Homeboy @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like if Trump isn’t on the bill due to legal issues there’s going to be a coordinated effort amongst wackjob republicans to write him in, resulting in some interesting results in the states that are traditionally a tight race.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those who support Trump are not a reflection of the values Americans have, but a darkness that America has surpressed since 1865.

      • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed and well said. The consistent failure to reject the historical culture that celebrated slavery, Jim Crow laws, segregation, and decades of public and private racism have lead to an ingrained wrongheadedness in parts of American society. The reward for their ignorance and hatred is Trump.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is the theory of the case on how he loses the GOP primary? He’s polling higher than the rest of the field combined. At this time, unless he dies before the election, I don’t see how he doesn’t end up as the Republican nominee.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like a lot of people would still insist on voting for him even if he was dead. Assuming of course that they believe the “liberal media fake news” that he’s dead.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly a dead Trump presidency would be a net positive to the world compared to a alive Trump presidency. Do a Weekend at Bernie’s I don’t care.

        Every single day of Trump Presidency 2016-2020 was “What is this moron going to do today?” And just dominating the news. We are still feeling ripple effects of all the BS he rolled back.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trump spoiling the 2024 election for the Republicans would be like a wet dream come true for me.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trump runs into a issue with the Fourteenth Amendment where states can block him from the ballot. Only a 2/3 vote in Congress can prevent that.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, aside from bad fanfic what is the way he’s not the nominee and on the ballot in all 51 electoral jurisdictions?

        • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not a bad fanfic - states are already looking into blocking him on the ballot under the 14th ammendment. Sceptics are arguing that they can’t do that until he’s been convicted, but proponents are arguing that a conviction is unecessary as removal from the ballot is not a criminal punishment and can be done in other cases as well. No telling exactly how that plays out, but the probability level is higher than that of the plot progressions within your average WatPad post.

          • Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean when even the federalist society are penning their opinions on various publications supporting such a position…

            • gac11@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Isn’t the opposite true though as well? Can’t red states just make up reasons to remove biden if a conviction isn’t required?

              • agentsquirrel@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, if they could identify an instance in which he “engaged in insurrection or rebellion […], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. Biden has never committed such an offense, so in order for red states to attempt this they’d have to fabricate facts and have a sufficient number of state officials go along with it, essentially The Big Lie 2.0.

              • ganksy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It is insurrection specific so states would have the burden of proving (if they cared about proof) Biden was engaged with an insurrection.

        • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Legally he can not be on the ballot in any of the 51 electoral jurisdictions per the United States Consitution.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t. I get the appeal, but he is not charged with anything that falls under the clause nor is he likely to be charged with such. Historical and legal precedent requires a finding in law of such violation for the clause to be applicable. It’s wishcasting.

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        o person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

        Emphasized the bold part because I don’t quite understand why we would want that to even be an option.

        • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I imagine the thinking is that if a rebellion has 2/3 support in both houses of Congress, it was probably popular enough to not be disqualifying.

  • who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Surely they have searched the depths of their party to find the best candidate and this traitorous con man was the best that they could do. JFC there is no need to be a republican anymore.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You ask yourself, what do conservatives want in a President? They want people they don’t like to suffer. They want to feel like their way of life is superior to any other and to not be confronted about it. They want to be able to inflict pain and suffering whenever the feel annoyed.

      • who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They want a King. Conservatives are largely people fit to be ruled. You give them too much credit, they are not cruel and evil, they are scared and pathetic.

  • lordxakio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Same thing that happened last time. Everyone knew Hilary was becoming president, and everybody was shocked when it wasn’t.

      • scottywh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My cognitive dissonance prevented me from realizing it would be trump somehow despite my not believing it would be Hill-dog…

        I’m sad and embarrassed to admit that I voted third party on that one.

        I also never imagined so far ahead to think how shitty trump would be if it actually went that way.

        “Fool me once… Can’t be fooled again”

  • shuzuko@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All that says to me is that we need to do our damnedest to keep him away from that nomination. I’ll be voting in the R primaries next spring, at a minimum.