• 3 Posts
  • 185 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle





  • 200 years with current technology.

    With breeders reactors such as superphenix built in the 90s you can multiply this amount by almost a 100.

    After a millennia if we still rely on the same technology and we start to worry about the supply we can start seawater extraction of uranium. Seawater extraction is not considered economically viable right now but it as the potential of bringing the supply nuclear reactors for another few billions years.

    So from a practical point of view it could be considered as renewable or close to it.






  • If we play “I would rather”, I would rather have a nuclear waste facility than a copper, lithium or cobalt mine in my garden.

    The transition to renewables energy will requires A LOT of mining and mines are awful for the environment.

    At least with nuclear waste we can try to contain it, mining waste is just left in the open and pollute the land and water with heavy metals.

    We don’t talk much about the environmental impact of mining because it mostly impact low income country and there is no clean mining, so the only way to reduce the impact of mining is to reduce our consumption, but no one wants to hear about that. Globally we prefer pretending that we can transform our consumption to be sustainable

    The only clean energy is the one that we don’t use, after that there is just a list of less worse alternatives, nuclear, solar and wind are on the “less worse” category but they still have a terrible impact on the environment.