• 1 Post
  • 400 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle




  • Yeah, I looked into it and the backend is proprietary, so the central owner can restrict features. Like for instance independent instances can only have 10 users.

    It’s “decentralised” except only in extremely limited scope, the code is centrally controlled and the network remains largely, functionally centralised.

    They’re capitalising on the decentralised, federated buzz while doing it so poorly they’re setting up users to say “oh people tried decentralisation, it doesn’t work, look at Bluesky”.

    If it’s not open source, it’s not decentralised.


  • I probably said it too dramatically, the kinds of people that need to hear it will just knee-jerk dismiss me, but seriously think about the phrase “normal names are required for the functioning of society”. What a wild-ass thing to say. Required why? Is society really that fragile? Sounds like maybe it should be replaced by something that can handle the occasional mildly spicy letter. Mine isn’t even that spicy, it’s like whole-egg-mayo levels of spice.


  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.nettoProgrammer Humor@programming.devAsking the real questions
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    No they’re not. They’re required for us to be catalogued and managed by a state, to our detriment and the enrichment of the ruling class.

    “Normality” is a fucking scam that keeps your imagination in check, so you never look outside your assigned box and realise you don’t have to belong to anyone.

    You have no idea how much genocidal violence has been done to condition our society to accept a dystopic phrase like “normal names are required for the functioning of society”.

    Your mind has been caged.



  • As someone with a very mildly unusual name, I can tell you that it doesn’t matter whether a system could or could not meaningfully represent the name. Often the people or systems just refuse to acknowledge any deviation from what’s expected. Sometimes databases are written to enforce arbitrary grammatical rules that make my name impossible to write, or the people using the systems will just “correct” the “error” without telling me. I don’t mind that much but our normative systems just love to homogenise us.



  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.nettoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldThis is just cruel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’d say they’re different to bone apple tea because that’s a nonsense phrase whereas these could conceivably stand in for the original.

    Eggcorn in particular has somewhat replaced acorn in a region of the US where those words sound the same, and the reason it’s not wrong is because it is a corn - a seed - and it does have an egg shape in it, so “eggcorn” is descriptively accurate.



  • “Gay coated” is just an amazing eggcorn that I have never heard before.

    So eggcorns are misheard phrases that are then reinterpreted in a way that still makes sense in context, and that video makes the point that they’re not actually wrong, and sometimes they can compete with the original phrase.

    The original term is “gay coded”, as in the creators have used commonly recognised “code” to signal that the characters are gay.

    But I actually love the idea that they’re just slathered in the gay, just lubed up head to toe.


  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.nettoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldThis is just cruel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Memes. They hijack pop culture and turn it into a dogwhistle, like if you’ve seen people randomly saying “is that a jojos reference?” underneath some worryingly bigoted comment on youtube, they’re trying to indicate that they’re a fellow right wing asshole. For a long time “subscribe to pewdiepie” was used. Both references had some nazi connection, like jojos had a nazi character, and pewdiepie flirted with nazi stuff in a deniable way.

    The point is that it’s silly and innocuous so that if anybody tries to call it out then they can just gaslight them and point out how silly it is, and they’re clearly making something out of nothing.




  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.nettoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldIt's finally over.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    We didn’t stipulate the track tying murderer was being executed, looks like they’re fighting on top of a train. There may not have been any options to stop them falling off the side.

    And of course they’re dangerous, they tied a huge number of people to train tracks against their will. That implies a lot of strength, cunning and martial skill, and willingness to do harm up close and personal. Without overwhelming force the only way to neutralise a threat like that may be to kill.


  • If you can tie someone to tracks then you have complete control over them. That’s not defensive violence against the murderers, it’s an elaborate execution. It’s not about whether their souls are clean or whatever, it’s about whether there’s an immediate need to kill them.

    My position is that the death penalty is never justifiable. The point is that this person presents a danger and for whatever reason you can’t stop them with a less permanent method.