Fast left
- 9 Posts
- 670 Comments
Your post history is supporting israel. Are you sure you don’t want Trump to win?
He’s completely right about everything there.
Unless he is selectively banning trans people, not making a tech discord server about those discussions is perfectly fine.
1·10 months agoIsn’t like every CAD program single core? People got scammed hard with Xeon in the past. CAD PC salesmen had/have absolutely no idea what they were talking about
Biggest speedup has been the GPU integration. The single core stuff doesn’t seem to matter much anymore.
11·11 months agoNo the amount of campaign funding should be capped.
Billionaires don’t consist of “their own money”. Most of it is in stocks which get bought by groups that “share their interests”
If they aren’t forcing them to push a certain agenda then sure. But since that’s impossible to verify it’s best that money gets banned from politics alltogether.
It’s very obvious that the people who give speeches at Aipac and call themselves Zionists get a lot of money for their campaign in return. It’s a direct exchange. People like AOC don’t seem to attract these “generous campaign donors.”
Just like how the Russians funded Trumps campaign, israel is bankrolling Bidens (and Trumps of course, they always play both sides).
Of course they are. That’s obvious to anyone who isn’t a completely brainwashed American.
Campaign donations from people who lobby for israel are indeed bribes.
https://www.democracynow.org/2024/1/2/ryan_grim_the_squad_congress_2024
AIPAC is spending 100 million dollars on morally bankrups Democrats to replace AOC, Ilhan Omar and other Democrats that spoke out against israel’s Genocide.
Anyone in bed with AIPAC receives massive bribes that’s common knowledge. Not in direct cash but in campaigning money so they get into power. And yes this is obviously bribing, I don’t care if you refuse to admit that lobbying is bribing.
And Biden is in bed with AIPAC. Surely you’re not denying that.
Genocide Joe don’t care. You’re still gonna vote for him.
18·11 months agoI feel like it’s more pandering to investors than having actual faith it it taking off.
That’s crazy. If only Biden was receiving massive bribes from AIPAC to support Genocide too. Wouldn’t that be ironic?
107·11 months agoDishonest? The lawmaker literally said these words.
There’s a translated video in the article that doesn’t leave much room for creative interpretation like steventheIDF is suggesting https://twitter.com/i/status/1742415488519393502
Good thing you’re always out there on every article to defend israel against the dishonest OP’s.
Do care to post your relevant findings as snippets like I have done. I’m very interested in all this proof the New York Times offers. I guess are better at finding it than me.
Oooh they just “reported on a woman possibly being raped”
They didn’t post an entire article about an “exclusive investigation” purely focused on “confirmed” rape allegations right? Let’s see that title
Screams Without Words’: How Hamas Weaponized Sexual Violence on Oct. 7
You are really cool New York Times creating fake rape stories to push a Zionist agenda huh? It’s no biggie at all to you. You do you too. Your world view seems like one that you are not interested in changing.
The only one failing to dunk is you. The New York Times basing a hit piece on some crazy IDF Facebook shill is the same shit we saw with the 40 beheaded babies.
Surely in an article about rape being weaponized and the women described on the entire first page not actually being raped isn’t relevant! It’s not a propaganda piece when you can use plausible deniabilty to blame the IDF!
The New York Times “veryfing” video evidence without mentioning that they didn’t see rape isn’t relevant! The family that saw the body and pictures and didn’t claim she was raped aren’t relevant!
All witnesses they claim they interviewed aren’t relevant! Forget the fact that this now proves the NYT and the IDF have no actual video evidence nor forensic evidence of any rape but only those “carefully collected witness statements” which now show to also not be carefully collected.
The evidence is now just “yeah the IDF said that Hamas did the rape thingy so that means it’s true! The IDF never lies!”
What amazing journalistic integrity from the New York Times truly a well researched article and not a complete Zionist propaganda article.
I recommend you fully read the article I posted before trying to defend this “news” outlet because it’s actually a lot worse than just the synopsis that I posted here.
Really? You read the New York Times article? Are you sure? Because the entire first page of that article is about this woman
At first, she was known simply as “the woman in the black dress.” In a grainy video, you can see her, lying on her back, dress torn, legs spread, vagina exposed. Her face is burned beyond recognition and her right hand covers her eyes.
The video was shot in the early hours of Oct. 8 by a woman searching for a missing friend at the site of the rave in southern Israel where, the day before, Hamas terrorists massacred hundreds of young Israelis.
The video went viral, with thousands of people responding, desperate to know if the woman in the black dress was their missing friend, sister or daughter. One family knew exactly who she was — Gal Abdush, mother of two from a working-class town in central Israel, who disappeared from the rave that night with her husband.
As the terrorists closed in on her, trapped on a highway in a line of cars of people trying to flee the party, she sent one final WhatsApp message to her family: “You don’t understand.”
Based largely on the video evidence — which was verified by The New York Times — Israeli police officials said they believed that Ms. Abdush was raped, and she has become a symbol of the horrors visited upon Israeli women and girls during the Oct. 7 attacks.
Hey by the way, about this article’s credibility…
Three statements and all of them wrong that’s impressive.