![](/static/undefined/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0da8d285-3457-4e5b-af21-b38609b07eea.webp)
They were basically illegal until 1982. It was considered, and I believe still is, market manipulation.
They were basically illegal until 1982. It was considered, and I believe still is, market manipulation.
I think a lot of people are misunderstanding what’s going on here. There is an open league and a league restricted to women only.
Without a women’s league, there are fewer women seen playing, which reinforces the perception that it’s not a sport for women, which creates this feedback loop leading to a smaller pool of women playing chess, thus fewer grand masters who are women. I see value in creating more space for women in chess to create more opportunities for following generations.
I don’t like excluding trans women. I can imagine an argument that we’re not ready for this until we get to a place where we don’t think to distinguish between trans and cis women. A women’s league in 2023 that a young cis girl is watching that had 3 cis women and 97 trans women, still may look to that young girl like a league for trans women, and not a league for all women that they can see themselves competing in. Personally, I enjoyed watching a marginalized gender eSports competition, and I don’t think the presence of trans women invalidated the impact it could have inspiring young cis girls to pick up gaming.
“That depends, young man. Is Goku bloodlusted? Otherwise, I think I stand a shot 4/10 with planning time.”
This Nerdwriter video helped me understand his approach to speaking. https://youtu.be/_aFo_BV-UzI