Maybe your install is bugged. Try clearing the cache and a app restart if that doesn’t fix the issue. Uninstall and reinstall firefox (backup your data 1st before).
Firefox has and is buggy on android. You may need to occasionally restart it once a while. It will continue to be improved. But, that may take time. Like the increased extensions which took years after the rewrite.
Sure, here you go:
In the “Smartphone Awards 2023!” YouTube video, the host highlights various categories of smartphones, starting with the best big phone, which is won by the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra for its understated design, advanced hardware capabilities, software updates, and stylus support. The host also discusses the best small phones and folding phones, with the Asus Zenphone 10 being crowned the winner for its 5.9-inch display, competitive hardware, and elimination of previous nitpicks. The iPhone 15 Pro receives recognition for the best camera in a smartphone due to its total performance, ease of use, and excellent video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is identified as the best value option, offering essential features at an affordable price without significant drawbacks. The presenter acknowledges the OnePlus Open as the best foldable phone due to its innovative design, nearly perfect square folding screen, and unique multitasking features.
There’s more, I wasn’t sure if it would be appropriate to paste the entire text in the comment’s section. So, I will leave a link here: https://www.summarize.tech/youtube.com/watch?v=JkRXhe3KaPE
An interesting exercise would be to summarise the summary from the website. I will see if sherpa or MLCchat can do the job.
Oops, I did not add a “/s” because, I assumed both yours and the comment you had replied to were sarcasm. I missed the question mark on your comment. Phone calls are universal on every device supporting a compatible network (2G, LTE, 5G, etc).
Yeah, like a telephone call. But, not a telephone call.
True. Being able to match snapdragon 870 is no small feat. With time they should be able to surpass current gen snapdragon.
It depends on the ISP(Image signal processor). Companies can tune. But, there can, and will be minor differences between different Socs.
Thas was totally unacceptable. The competition provides UFS 3.1 for A54’s price. Meanwhile, Samsung provided 2.1/2.2 like phones which cost half as much.
Multi core performance is good. But, the single core performance doesn’t see much improvement. Also, hopefully they do not skimp on the storage speeds like the A54.
I see. I was concerned about the reduced activity levels overall down to single vote posts.
Turn off all related functions for photos in the Google photos app and delete any backed up pictures. Finally, disable/uninstall the Google photos app from your phone.
Perhaps, but it’s price makes it more accessible compared to the z flip
As long as it doesn’t negatively impact thernals and battery life. It’s acceptable.
I need this feature in Material files and solid explorer.
It has 256GB of internal storage but includes an HD+ display? That resolution on a 6.78 is going to be noticeable. If they had reduced the internal and instead provided a full HD display, it would’ve been great. I’m more curious how the AOD will work with the LCD display. Will it drain a significant amount of battery or be negligible. Which would be explained by the HD panel.
Considering, the mobile browser also has addons and will gain hundreds more in a few months. It’s a no-brainer.
Stupid if you ask me. Youtube is not, should not be the platform for games.
Wow, 12000mm² vs 5000². Now, this is something I can get behind. Samsung (and perhaps google) should take note. Especially for exynos.
I know that. I was just asking what the actual adb commands do like the compile-layouts parameter, the last bgdexopt job. Why are all 3 necessary. Samsung has a galaxy app booster that appears to do something similar.
Hmm, let’s see. Your microarchitecture and clock speed do dictate your processor performance. But, equally important is your process node. If it’s built on an inefficient node, it will take more power and produce more heat to provide the same and sometimes even worse performance as other chips built on a more efficient node.
This became so much clear when qualcomm released the snapdragon 8 gen 1 and the snapdragon 8 +gen 1. The 1st was built on a samsung node and performed poorly compared to its predecessors. The 8+gen 1 was built on an improved TSMC process, which actually improved performance and provided better battery life.
Then, there are times that your SoC implementation is poor. Like for example, the infamous snapdragon 810 (and 808). That was a dumpster fire full of throttling issues.
You can watch this geekerwan video to know more: https://youtu.be/s0ukXDnWlTY?si=U3yV7Rr88-5g7Lr_
Thanks for the heads up. This will make sure we never commit such criminal activity ever again.