He was monkey pawed out of existence as he typed

Ignore Hamas. Read the infamous report from the US that was used by Israel as evidence they weren’t committing genocide. The report cleared Israel, and so it was used as a defense.

But actually read the report.

According to the US / Israel, they’re holding up food, making it difficult to access, making it get stuck in transit, making it get lost, making zero effort to facilitate / distribute, making it dangerous for people to solve it themselves, etc.

But they never triggered the video game-like definition of genocide. They didn’t use god-like powers to absolutely withhold food. They didn’t declare “I’m doing a genocide.” Technically some people could eat sometimes, and some pencil pusher can’t change definitions on the fly, therefore no genocide.

I thought it would be like a cool backpacker, maybe some Bourdain energy to him.

Who cares about being antisemitic?

I’m a proud antisemite; I think Israel shouldn’t commit genocide.

I am a huge sinophobe; I think uyghurs shouldn’t be “reeducated.”

I fucking hate Canadians; first nations got screwed.

I hate all Arabs and muslims; kashnoggi shouldn’t have been cut into pieces.

I hate white people; we need to fix inequality.

I’m a traitor to my country; I think it could be improved.

I’m a devil worshipper; I like D&D.

Ads have started to straight up break the internet for me. I can go to websites and they’ll complain about my ad blocker, and the only help I get is “disable your extensions.” I don’t even have any extensions! No ad block! But sites still curl up and die on me.

Is it because my browser is hardened? Is it Linux? Do I have to fork over private data to use a site and if I don’t they pretend the issue is ad blockers?

It’s amusing that out of the few articles I’ve seen it’s only been pictures of girls. There’s no way that old backpacker dude or a friggin lawyer didn’t have photos. I can go digging I guess but I was just mildly curious what people who traveled and drank at these places looked like.

"… this is the fucking Pentagon! … Even if the allegations are fake, it doesn’t matter because he was supposed to tell us what we needed to know so we could be better prepared to defend him — not learn about it from the media.”

They want to make the government small enough to drown in a bathtub and they can’t even find police reports about a potential hire.

Then the man cake stings the boat and when you ask why he says, “Because it’s in my nature.”

deleted by creator

I wonder if North Korea would inflict more casualties than the amount of people defecting from their military. Their border is obsessively controlled so good luck having a bunch of troops near civilization and keeping them.

The person talking out of their ass is voted up.

The person bringing up facts is voted down.

The person posting dismissive nonsense is voted up.

Gross.

People trying to discuss the topic have their posts pushed down while “lmao nfts” are voted up. How do you see someone saying, respectfully, “I think there’s a benefit to this.” and try to push down their contribution?

Anyone who wants a good discussion about news in this community, must leave this community. If you want to add context or opposing perspectives, better go elsewhere. You build a community like this and you get people who know Hans had a vibrator, because jokes and legit opinions are treated as interchangable.

Nothing comes up when you search Pennsylvania + foregone conclusion. Unless you mean police making you give up passwords, which was deemed illegal by higher courts.

An important difference is that cruise control is simpler to understand. It’s a basic mechanic dressed up as a driver aid. A smaller slice of the population will incorrectly use cruise control.

FSD is a driver aid dressed up as… well, “Full Self-Driving.” It’s not Full, and it’s not Self-Driving. It’s mostly functional in limited circumstances and even then requires driver attention.

I think another good example is how people would never allow a Stasi agent to live in their house, unless the Stasi agent was redefined as a slew of websites, a collection of disparate laws, and multiple steps involving technology.

In the bible god punished the atheists cooperating together to build monuments to themselves with… misunderstanding.

Before that, he punished the humans who hurt other humans with diluvial genocide.

In their own lore it shows that it’s better to be an atheist who loves their fellow man, than to be a god-fearing human paraquat.

No, this isn’t right. This needs more grease.

deleted by creator

I can’t get Xi to show up in the results proper but he shows up as the thumbnail in the search suggestion Nimrod.

I tried to get a summary with an llm

The article explains how Russia has managed to evade Western sanctions on its oil sector by using a network of intermediaries and shell companies to sell its crude oil to China, India and other countries. The article estimates that Russia has earned about $11 billion from these transactions since 2022, despite being under US and EU sanctions for its annexation of Crimea and involvement in the war in Ukraine. The article also reveals how Russia has used its state-owned oil company Rosneft and its subsidiary RN-Exploration to explore and develop oil fields in Venezuela, Iran and Syria, which are also under US sanctions.

The article claims that these activities have helped Russia maintain its influence and leverage in the global oil market, as well as its political and military alliances with these countries. The article cites several sources, including US officials, analysts, traders and documents, to support its findings.

The article concludes by saying that the US and its allies have failed to curb Russia’s oil ambitions, and that the sanctions have had little impact on Russia’s economy or its ability to finance its military operations

Why can’t others do this without being ostracized?

Why don’t we all just… “I think we should invade Afghanistan because that’s what Link would do – I mean Saddam is basically Ganondorf!”

We should all be able to have the childlike privilege of using cartoon characters as rhetorical devices in adult conversations.