wolf@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoGoogle Chrome pushes ahead with targeted ads based on your browser historywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square364fedilinkarrow-up11.39Karrow-down124file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.37Karrow-down1external-linkGoogle Chrome pushes ahead with targeted ads based on your browser historywww.theregister.comwolf@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square364fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareCptOblivius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoSomeone needs to make an extension that googles random stuff all the time and floods ones history with so much background noise that the history becomes useless.
minus-squarebobman@unilem.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI recommend using ‘Adnauseam’ for Firefox. It hides ads in addition to clicking them. This generates revenue for the site and also obscures your digital footprint.
minus-squareCrayonRosary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoOr, you know, just don’t use Chrome or Google!
minus-squareHadriscus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·edit-21 year agoThat would be an ecological disaster (figuratively, but still), since all those requests and processor cycles have a cost
minus-squareUFO64@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoWhat’s the watts-per-search of google?
minus-squareHadriscus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoHere’s a lead https://fullfact.org/environment/google-search/
minus-squareNatanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoAny more than regular multiplayer games? No?
minus-squaremoog@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·1 year agoit would not replace multiplayer games. it would add to the load. strawman moot point.
minus-squareNatanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhat I mean is that the relative resources use is insignificant
minus-squareHadriscus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAre you proposing to replace multiplayer games with random web requests ?
minus-squareNatanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo. How hard can it be to understand it’s a comparison of total load?
minus-squareHadriscus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoHow hard can it be to converse nonviolently ?
Someone needs to make an extension that googles random stuff all the time and floods ones history with so much background noise that the history becomes useless.
This already exists btw
I recommend using ‘Adnauseam’ for Firefox.
It hides ads in addition to clicking them. This generates revenue for the site and also obscures your digital footprint.
Or, you know, just don’t use Chrome or Google!
That would be an ecological disaster (figuratively, but still), since all those requests and processor cycles have a cost
What’s the watts-per-search of google?
Here’s a lead
https://fullfact.org/environment/google-search/
Any more than regular multiplayer games? No?
it would not replace multiplayer games. it would add to the load. strawman moot point.
What I mean is that the relative resources use is insignificant
Are you proposing to replace multiplayer games with random web requests ?
No. How hard can it be to understand it’s a comparison of total load?
How hard can it be to converse nonviolently ?