• Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a good start but it blocks about 90% without browser plugins. I use both DNS blocking and ublock and I can block nearly everything unless the ads are being served from the same domain.

      • m_randall@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I haven’t tried nextdns but I moved from PiHole to AdGuard Home. It can still be locally hosted and the UI is waaaay better and it offers more configuration, including per client settings. I really don’t know why PiHole is still recommended.

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pihole seems simple enough for my needs. I can add more lists if needed. I have kids but they are beyond the age of needing to control their online usage.

          I’m just interested in privacy, ads, tracking and malware blocking.

          Next thing I want is to hide my DNS requests from the isp.

          • m_randall@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh yea - there’s nothing wrong with PiHole - it works fine. I ran it for years. I just feel AdGuard is the better choice these days.

            • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve only recently set it up so I’ll try some other solutions. I looked at nextDNS but a friend is using it and says the free edition isn’t enough and don’t really want to pay

      • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know I can run pihope on my own, but I’d rather pay $20/year and just use next DNS. one less self hosted service to deal with if it randomly broke

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only issue with next DNS is that it has no access to internal identities. If a system accessed a malicious site, I want to know which system. The best way of doing that is to self host.