Edit 12:11 PM 11/6 Pacific
Kentucky (8), Indiana (11), West Virginia (4), Florida (30), South Carolina (9), Tennessee (11), Alabama (9), Mississippi (6), Oklahoma (7), Arkansas (6), North Dakota (3), South Dakota (3), Nebraska (4*), Wyoming (3), Louisiana (8), Texas (40), Ohio (17), Missouri (10), Montana (4), Utah (6), Idaho (4), Iowa (6), Kansas (6), North Carolina (BG-16), Georgia (BG-16), Pennsylvanya (BG-19), Wisconsin (10), Michigan (15), Maine (1*), Alaska (3), Arizona (11) and Nevada (6) called for Trump.

Vermont (3), Connecticut (7), District of Columbia (3), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (11), Rhode Island (4), Delaware (3), Illinois (19), New Jersey (14), New York (28), Colorado (10), California (54), Washington (12), Oregon (8), Virginia (13), Hawaii (4), New Mexico (5), New Hampshire (4), Minnesota (10), Nebraska (1*), Maine (3*) for Harris.

2 counties in PA have extended voting hours due to voting machine problems. 9:30 PM in one, 10:00 PM in the other.

Multiple precincts in Georgia have extended hours due to bomb threats.

Edit 03:09 PM Pacific Harris wins Guam.

https://www.guampdn.com/news/guam-picks-harris-over-trump-in-non-binding-presidential-straw-poll/article_657b06b8-9b97-11ef-9896-1302c4e2ebe9.html

This thread is for the Presidential election, my plan is to start marking wins as soon as they are called, sorted by time zone.

Some states are going to take longer than others. Polls generally close at 8 PM local time, but they can’t start counting early/mail in votes until after the polls close.

Wisconsin in particular has an interesting system where ballots are collected by MUNICIPALITY, not precinct, they have over 1,800 ballot counting locations and don’t report until ALL 1,800 are in.

https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2024/10/22/wisconsin-voters-election-milwaukee-security-denier

Currently 226 EC votes from Blue States:

4+19+10+7+3+3+4+10+11 +4+14+28+4+3+13+54+12 +10+5+8+6

NC called for Trump. -16 here, +16 to Trump.

GA called for Trump. -16 here, +16 to Trump.

PA called for Trump. -19 here, +19 to Trump.

AZ and NV both called for Trump, +11, +6

Which leaves 312 EC votes in Red States.

9+6+6+6+8+6+10+5+3+7 +3+40+30+11+8+17+9+11+4+3+4+4+3+16+16+19+11+6

270 to Win.

Online map here!

https://apnews.com/projects/election-results-2024/

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Harris has ONE path to victory, ONE.

    She has to win PA, MI, WI, MN.

    Losing any one of those 4 states ends it.

    MSNBC just called PA for Trump. That’s it, it’s over!

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      PA alone is 90% reporting with Trump leading in all but 7 districts and having nearly 3.4% more votes. Nothing is finalized, but if that sample is indicative of the overall votes (which by the law of large numbers, 6 million samples is probably accurate), he takes it.

      I hate to say it, but Harris would need a miracle to win that state, let alone the other three.

  • LostMyRedditLogin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Whoever ran the Harris campaign on Reddit deserves their salary. That was an amazing echo chamber that had me fooled. I was expecting a blue wave better than Biden 2020. Too bad it doesn’t translate into the election.

    • esc27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Trump always overperforms. Even in 2020 he did better than he had any right to. This time there is no covid hanging over his head and Biden/Harris are taking all the blame for inflation.

      It also does not hurt that millions of Americans willingly consume hours of right wing propaganda everyday. Fox News remains one of if not the top cable channel (after sports) and Joe Rogan one of the top podcasts. Meanwhile CNN has shifted right, papers like the Washington post have been compromised, and the remaining “liberal media” is so obsessed with appearing unbiased that they end up “sane washing” GOP craziness and inflating minor democrat flubs.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Biden 2020 was a nail-biter of a win and thus far I don’t think any of the states he won have been called for Trump. But there being no surprises in the blue direction is not very comforting even if Harris does pull it out.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      It’s going to boil down to VA, PA, MI, WI, MN. A Trump win in any of them puts him over the top. Harris has to take all five four. VA just got called for Harris. 1 down, 4 to go.

      MSNBC called PA for Trump, that’s it. It’s over.

      But the “Anti-Genocide” vote in Michigan is not significant.

      Donald Trump 47,322,739 votes (52.5%)
      Kamala Harris 41,760,788 votes (46.3%)
      Jill Stein 334,826 votes (0.4%)
      Chase Oliver 334,504 votes (0.4%)
      Robert Kennedy 291,829 votes (0.3%)
      Other candidates 160,156 votes (0.2%)

      Harris is down 6 million. The other protest votes are 10% of that.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        When the “anti-genocide” people accelerated and intensified the outcome of the existing genocide by protest voting for spoiler candidates it is really hard to muster any sympathy.

        Sometimes you have to be willing to play politics in order to win at politics. Purity testing doesn’t count for shit when the opposition is literally in favor of enslaving the entire human race for sport.

        Way to go! You really showed the lesser of two evils who’s boss, while the ultra-nationalist psycopaths erradicate millions more innocent people. Nice fucking job 👏

        • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Harris played it safe and it looks like she’s going to lose anyway, so maybe she should’ve considered more progressive ideas. Or maybe listened to her constituents instead of doing what Democrats always fucking do, and playing off the “you have to vote for us because we’re not them.”

          But no, let’s blame the voters for a candidate failing to win them over.

          • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            I’m fine with tacking to the left. She was not the candidate to do it. Until you have someone who is willing to threaten to rally the same kind of structural violence that Donald Trump is capable of in opposition, and actually make good on it, then moving to the middle is the only logical option. We either get serious about forcing our positions by any means necessary or pander to the lowest common denominator. Those are the only two options.

            • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              then moving to the middle is the only logical option.

              And Democrats will continue to lose because of this. Americans are tired of progress not happening, so I have to disagree with you.

              Democrats needed to rally the country and get them excited behind a progressive candidate actually willing to reflect their constituency. But they won’t, because that’s somehow considered radical by Democrats.

              The Democrats keep trying this middle-of-the-road status quo bullshit, and they keep losing. So maybe middle of the road isn’t the play anymore.

              • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                Did you somehow miss, or just conveniently ignore the first part of my comment where I literally called for a revolutionary candidate who was willing to restructure the face of the left by whatever means necessary?

                • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  No, I didn’t miss it, you just will never convince me that progress can only be made by riding in the middle. Harris needed to be a shift left that a lot of people in this country are desperate for, and instead, she chose centrist policies and pandering to Republicans for their votes.

                  The “political” game is over, we needed actual change, and we got it, just not from the candidate we needed.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Knew that poll was a flaming pile of horseshit the moment it came out. Lady got lucky a few cycles in a row.

  • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    So uh… what’s the right attitude to deal with this assuming we get a Trump? And I mean personally. I lean towards absurdism.

  • spector@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    The broadcaster in Canada interviewed a young Trump supporter woman. She said all the abortion fears are made up. And that abortion isn’t real healthcare.

  • criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I can’t believe we’re a few votes away from having a stooge at the helm and an anti vaxxer as the head of the CDC and FDA.

    This fucking hurts.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah. But we need to squarely focus the blame on Harris, the campaign, the apologists who excused some of here deeply unpopular positions, and disallowed the dissent that tried to bring her to more popular positions.

      In the previous 6 elections, the candidate that ran as an anti-elite populist won.

      This will make 7 (if Trump wins).

      • criss_cross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        There’s a lot of blame to go around.

        -Americans who tolerate and accept Trump’s behavior.

        -Biden for not calling it sooner and letting a proper candidate emerge. Harris was the best at the last minute but there should have been actual primaries.

        -Harris for not swinging for the fences and playing it safe.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          arming a genocide and going in on anti-crime and -migrant rhetoric is “playing it safe” jfc

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Yes, yes it is.

            Most of America wants to curb immigration.

            Most of America backs Israel or doesn’t care.

  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    it is not looking good. i guess we in central europe better start learning russian 😔

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Y’all probably should’ve invested in your military instead of letting America foot the bill