• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m seeing far too many variations of national strike/don’t buy anything/everyone local protest memes that are scattered throughout February. I can hear someone argue that they might want a month filled with protest, and that’s fine, but if you’re looking at this from the outside all you see is disorganized shifting dates and objectives. Shit needs to get organized. It’s head-shakingly liberal; everyone has their own agenda, all are legit and should be heard, but they all can’t pull together to succeed with the overwhelming show of force to be effective.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    This came up in another thread and I am surprised it is not as well known: General strikes are illegal in the United States since 1947’s Taft-Hartley Act.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft–Hartley_Act

    Attempts to organize and exert political and economic influence have to do so under the parameters of that act. Unions can’t support these things openly or officially without violating the act. So these things have to be called something other than a general strike to avoid persecution. They’re essentislly stripped of major legitimizing and organizing organ: labor unions, by default.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not a lawyer but I wonder how much teeth that law has. The GOP/Trump has put on a clinic on how to legally gum up the wheels of justice, it seems like unions could try the same. Delay, argue technicalities, appeal, rise, repeat…

      For example: if you spend 2 months in court arguing about who organized what and what they’re technically striking for, damage could still be done even with the strike broken up. Multiply that by a few major unions and it adds up.

      You can already see a similar plan coming together with UAWs 2028 contact expiration plan. Its not a general strike, there’s just coincidentally a lot of strikes at once.

      Of course there’s a stricter set of laws and leeway when you’re not a corrupt oligarch so it wouldn’t work. But it’s fun to think about…

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Its not a general strike, there’s just coincidentally a lot of strikes at once.

        Exactly. These are the hoops organized labor has to jump through to get even a footing.

        Meanwhile compare what the billionaire class is able to use for their signaling.

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Until people start taking protest seriously nothing will change. A single day for a few hours event will do nothing to sway them. It needs to be a prolonged event that hurts them

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          SO MUCH commerce surrounds a day at school. You disrupt that along with everything else.

          If Mom doesn’t have to go to work, she doesn’t have to stop for that Starbucks on the way in and fill the gas tank. She doesn’t have to pay to park or feed the meter. If she’s not taking the kid to school, she doesn’t have to drop them off early at early day care and doesn’t have to give them lunch money to spend. If you’re not at work, you wouldn’t eat that shitty Subway at lunch and wouldn’t have to go to that gathering at TGI Fridays after work. Little things that add up. Point is to show them that there is a light switch. You turn it off for a day to tell them you could turn it off longer if needed .

          • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I meant how is not going to school a protest exactly? They’re already dismantling education, this kinda plays to their favor. Not buying anything and messing with the economy makes sense, but avoiding school shouldn’t bother them in the least.

            Unless I’m missing something else, which is what I was trying to get at.

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Its a total blackout day. If your kid doesnt go to school and pay for the Cisco shitlunch then this also takes a stab at the economy. Its less useful as the rest unless you are in college. But what it really demonstrates is WE have the power. WE can stop everything, not you, Mr President. Its a power play relying on unity and cooperation.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Luigi already did that, now it’s time for the next step, or at least continue his legacy. With Musk on top of the list.

        • Prpl@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Small as for this not buying , not that other methods need to be pasued , of course what’s going big already should continue whiles this is added too. Of course its just one day, but I and a lot of people practice this everyday trying to buy as less as possible and reaching self-sufficiency.

          • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            People won’t do anything until it impacts them, or they perceive it impacts them, hence the sudden interest in protest now that Biden is out of office. Once a Democrat gets back in the WH, regardless that material conditions still suck, they will go back to brunch and ignore the things they claim to hold dear right now.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I dint think these general “buy nothing” days are the right way to go. Whatever people don’t buy on the day will just be bought the next day.

      I think it would be difficult to achieve anything more than a standard deviation in daily sales, as in its not really noticeable.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      What you’re asking is for single moms not to work and have enough money to feed kids and pay rent. You’re asking people to miss rent payments and be homeless. Some people can’t afford to do this, full stop.

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well then I suppose we better just call the whole thing off since single mothers can’t participate. That’s just an excuse to try and justify actions that accomplish nothing. If people used those same protest techniques 100 years ago, we would still be fighting for things like 40-hour, work week, paid holiday, sick time, etc. We would still be fighting civil rights movements from the '60s.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          With that mindset, since we can’t do anything for weeks on end, better call the whole thing off, since it can’t be done for weeks. I can say you thinking that doing it for one day is pointless is just an excuse for you to do nothing as well. You’re being extremely hypocritical.

          Are you out there putting your life on the line, risking your home and children’s safety? Or are you waiting and making excuses? Yeah, I think we both know the answer. You want others to risk everything but I’m guessing you’ve not risked anything. But I could be wrong, please tell me what you’ve done to effect this change you want so badly? What have you put on the line?

          • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m out there every single weekend, either helping feed the homeless, providing mutual aid, or some type of community building. I know how this shit works, and what doesn’t work. I’m probably doing more than any of the other shitlibs attending these things. IF they cared they would have been demonstrating during the blue fascists terms too, but all they know is performative politics.

            • Lightor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              Only the weekends huh? So only one or two days at a time? I heard one guy say that until people start taking protest seriously nothing will change. A single day or two will do nothing to sway them. It needs to be a prolonged event that hurts them. Wait, wasn’t that you? The guy not practicing what he preaches? Looks like I nailed it.

              And yes, let’s cap it all off by saying how you’re better than everyone else, and everyone else is just performative. Jesus, I’ve never seen someone hurt a cause they support so handedly through hypocrisy and ego. Impressive.

              • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Trying to conflate community aid with protest? One helps the community, the other fights the reasons community aid is necessary. Leave these issues to the actual people that know what they are doing, and stay the fuck out of our way.

                • Lightor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  That’s a lot of words to deflect from the fact that you’re not willing to do what you’re asking others to do. Sit back down, no one needs you telling the world how great you are while you demand from others what you won’t do yourself. When was the last time you protested for days, putting something on the line, like you’re judging others for not doing? Or have you been too busy patting yourself on the back about how you do more than any other lib.

      • the_q@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        You can’t afford to not do this. Change requires sacrifice. You can’t keep following their rules and expect anything to change.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s easy to say. But when a mother won’t be able to feed her kids or pay rent it becomes less black and white. I’d ask the people who keep saying this requires sacrifice, what have you sacrificed that is on that level? Because you should be ready to do the same.

          • the_q@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            You do realize there are starving and homeless people right now, right? I don’t know why you have to use mother’s and children as some kind of shield. There are starving and homeless people right now without protests.

            • Lightor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Yeah and? You’re asking someone to make the choice to not provide for their family. One person starving doesn’t make others starving any less meaningful. Seriously? This would create more homeless people. So if a new law was passed that made you homeless or wouldn’t matter, I mean there were homeless people already. Or if a whole town gets destroyed by a natural disaster, who cares, there were already people with nothing. The lack of empathy or just human decency is insane here.

              I’m not using them as a shield. That’s your problem, you’re not willing to try to understand the point, you see it as a fight you have to win. I’m explaining a situation and why I’m certain situations people are going to be human and try to do what it takes to eat and take care of their children. Asking them to not do that is a very large, and some might say heartless ask. Are you willing to risking being homeless or unable to eat to protest? If not, you’re asking someone to suffer immensely while you sit back comfortably.

              A lot of people ITT seem to have no problem demanding that people put their livelihoods on the line and risk everything they have, but I don’t see one person demanding that actually doing anything close to that themselves.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If this thread is like the others, there are no demands but a strong intention to express general discontent.

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah that’s a really good point.

          The general consensus seems to be that doing something is better than doing nothing.

          I really disagree though. After a few failed attempts people will lose heart and get in line.

          There seems to be half a dozen different protests now too, all on different days with no cohesive objectives

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            with no cohesive objectives

            That’s a pro. As soon as there’s a clear motif or leader, it’s very easy to undermine that single point of weakness. A general rabble sends the clear vibe of “we are not impressed, and might burn things” with the air of uncertainty to keep the powers that be on their toes.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Well I guess you can’t undermine a protest that isn’t protesting anything but that still doesn’t explain what the point of this non-protest protest is? How would a bunch of people not buying stuff for a day keep “the powers that be” (who? the capitalists? Their politicians? The police?) on their toes?

              • tetris11@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                “We saw a blip in <sale/metric/police safety> and we think it correlates with the general unhappiness of the populace, as displayed here, here, and maybe here.”

                Blips can cause panic, even small ones

                • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Is it supposed to hit profit margins? Because I doubt it will, people will still be buying necessities at the same amount and call me cynical, but I believe almost everyone will be buying the non-necessities the days before and after.

                  To be candid, it just sounds like the most toothless, do-nothing, slacktivism kind of protest that’s only meant to generate backpats

            • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              No it’s not. A general rabble isn’t going to achieve anything because they’re not asking for anything. Morale is low and participants are easily disuaded because they can see they’re not achieving anything. No one wants to risk physical harm or incarceration for a cause that just doesn’t really exist.

        • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          In my experience, in my country, a protest without a clear goal is a quick way for right wings to rally people with their agenda.

        • C126@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Don’t worry. The protest won’t matter at all and a large majority won’t even hear about it. Gives layabouts an excuse to layabout some more.

          • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Don’t worry. The protest won’t matter at all and a large majority won’t even hear about it.

            But that’s precisely what worries me, people spending effort that goes to waste instead of organizing something that effects a change

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Alright, let’s do it then?

      Blackout Friday

      • Every Friday until he’s gone and damage is reversed

      • We don’t transact at all each Friday.

      • We directly call the businesses we would have shopped at that day to tell them the dollar amount we’d be spending with them if democracy wasn’t under attack.

      • And/or email their corporate with the same message.

      Maybe they can dismiss a total boycott that as a hollow, reactionary promise that will pass, but saying “I will shop with you much less” feels much more real and they can see it being enough to reverse their endless growth line. They care about one thing.

      Who wants to post and get this started?