• pelya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 hour ago
      • They split off from Google.

      • They are not using satellites, they shine a lazer from one fixed tower to another, with range about 20 km.

      • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Ah, see that’s where not reading is a problem. Just saw star link competitor and remembered something a recently about China looking to launch a similar system.

        Odd they would phrase it as a ‘starlink competitor’ then though rather than ‘a new ISP bid’. Wireless systems with directional antenna relays are not really new, not sure if any use laser particularly but the concept is essentially the same.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      At sufficiently low orbits, the satellites would simply deorbit themselves because of the atmospheric drag. Several Starlink sats have been lost this way.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          I don’t know about the ozone layer specifically, but reentry turns the satellite into danger dust – mostly metal oxides and burnt polymers. Ozone, being a very strong oxidizer, is the most likely to react with the hot debris, so it probably does damage the ozone layer, but I can’t quantify the damage, or the released pollutants.

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          When they say “burn up on reentry” they don’t mean disintegrate, they mean burn. It’s exactly like throwing thousands of home entertainment systems in a fire except that the pollution is in the upper atmosphere where normal pollution doesn’t reach.

      • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, more thinking the wasted time, resources, and emissions involved in building, launching, managing, and then whenever makes it down.

        Take all that and make something useful instead, whatever happened to Google fiber being built out all over? More reliable, faster, doesn’t involve sending piles of redundant satellites into space…

        • popcap200@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Supposedly traditional ISP’s have tons and tons of lawyers and filed every single step of the way to stop Google from intruding on their local monopolies.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I guess that’s better but honestly not by much.

    See that guy between Bezos and Musk at the Trump inauguration? That’s Sundar Pichai, Alphabet/Google CEO.

    • recall519@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      It’s worse. Right now, people see the fascism in front of their eyes. They can choose to wake up or remain delusional. Before, it was masked and the average Joe wouldn’t know better.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’s zero better. Every one and every thing that bends the knee to fascism is fascist, and should be treated the same.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If I were forced to pick between the two I’d take the guy who is only a white supremacist when it’s profitable over the guy who is a white supremacist every waking moment.

        Call it 1% better, if that.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          Sure, for the list of executions at the Hague Musk should take priority, but you shouldn’t buy products from any fascist. The difference between 99% fascist and 90% fascist is inconsequential.

  • Singletona082@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yea no. This company might even sincerely want to do its own constillation yet I doubt that. This is just to give the optics of ‘see! Musk isn’t a monopoly!’ along with ‘see! we’re not trump’s puppets! We’re fighting against President Musk!’

    Same as their halfhearted attempts at laying fiber.

  • lennee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    ok cool, whos gonna buy that? Europe wants to be independent from US big tech, elon got the US gov by the balls and china surely has their own thing.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Its not for people to buy. Companies like Google simply don’t need to make profit anymore.

      Its to show growth potential to investors. And when they inevitably cut the program, it will also show growth potential to investors since then it will be millions of dollars saved.

  • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Im very much open to replacing my Starlink - but this isn’t it. Land based lasers are just going to be attached to things called cell towers - and if I have one of those nearby… then I’d use cellular.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      It’s still longer distance than cellular and it can get even better. Cell towers will always win.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The tech sounds useful to bridge cell towers in rural areas among each other to skip satellites and laying cables.

      Back when I was still in university, dormatories’ internet was established using a similar tech to the main campus. It was great, except on snowy days. Then there was just no internet at all.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      a two-minute scan of products for sale on amazon will tell you that society is to the point of mashing keyboards to string letters together to come up with company names. this at least has consonants and vowels arranged in an order that resembles a word.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    How do you keep birds from landing on it and shitting up the lens and blocking the laser?

    It’s the law of outdoor infrastructure. If it’s outside, and it’s high up, it will get shat upon.

    • Alekzzand3r@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You put some bird spikes around the lens. Same thing that is done for windows in cities with pigeons.

  • Pissmidget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The picture of a dystopian future where feudal oligarchs are shooting down each others low orbit internet satellites in the furious competition for best coverage popped into my head.

    Who are we casting as the satellite retrieval specialist with a penchant for bonsai trees living in an off grid log cabin?

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not familiar with the current crop of actors, but Honestly I’d love william shatner and nicolas cage be in this one. Cage getting to go full tilt as the CEO who’s put offensive lasers on his satilites marketing them as an anti kessler syndrome measure but really jsut wanting to fry competitors.

      Shatner even has the bonus of having a REALLY nice ranch they could use for location shots of shatner’s home as he’s talked into helping train the group of loonies that are going up there.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Heh, that’s a good future.

      The one we’re speeding towards is where they all collude, and all the service is shitty and the same (or worse) as its ever been. If its not just monopolized. That’s why Night City is a relatively good place to live in CP2077: There’s still competition.